"Libertarian" Vax Thuggery

"Libertarian" Vax Thuggery
http://tinyurl.com/VaccinationIsViolation

“Vaccination is a barbarous practice and one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time. Conscientious objectors to vaccination should stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defense of their conviction.” Mahatma Gandhi

Among those who should know better a shockingly large group of people who call themselves "libertarians" (some of whom I've known in the movement for decades) have bought into the Big Pharma Big Govt Big Lie about Vaccination. Even Sen. Rand Paul is seen "rolling up his sleeve" to get that shot... during a mass media frenzy of vaccination indoctrination.

Led by such formerly right "libertarian" publications like (sic) Reason and formerly left "libertarian" publications like The Guardian, there are increasingly shrill calls to "shun" Vaccine Conscientious Objectors or to "deny" us a hearing the the public forum.

And the troops are circling around their pseudo-science of imposed "immunity." Rima Laibow MD, one of my co-trustees at Natural Solutions Foundation, and I have both found in recent days that our attempts to post rebuttals to the most outrageous lies about the alleged "safety" and "efficacy" of vaccines are being blocked, by, for example, Kos.

The decree has issued forth: the "science" is settled; there is no debate allowed. Everyone knows the signs of witchcraft... haven't rulers and religious leaders and the best scholars here in the 16th Century proven it? Of course they have... and if you disagree you must be one of them...  "Burn the Witches!"  Look for the signs on their bodies; you know they are the source of contagion. They use strange herbs. If only there were less witches, there would be less disease...*

But I digress. It's not the 16th Century. We live in enlightened times.

"Everyone" knows that Comrade Stalin is always right. Lysenkoism is the only allowed biological view. Anyone who talks about "evolution" will go to the Gulag... Oh, sorry, digressing again.

Sorry, I keep on time-tripping; must be PTSD from fighting for freedom all these years...

Now I'm in Vienna in the 19th Century, at the grave of Dr. Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, hounded to suicide by the medical authorities who knew, scientifically, that physicians do not need to wash their hands between the dissecting table and the birthing room. Anyone who says otherwise must be shunned until they just... die. Oh my.

Back again here in the ever more enlightened 21st Century.

When crony "scientists" revolve from the crony corporations to the crony universities to the crony "public health" agencies we are expected to believe in their disinterested scientism.

Ignore that government claims the power to lie to us for any or no reason.

Ignore that Big Pharma provides 80% of the FDA/CDC budget.

Ignore all those high paying, cushy jobs they expect to get.

                    Just believe that they will tell the truth.

Ignore the 98,000,000 doses of Polio Vaccine that were pushed onto Americans and Europeans, AFTER the scientists knew that a potentially dangerous Monkey Virus somehow had ended up in the Vaccine. Nothing to be concerned about... even as the cancer rates started to nudge up some more.

And if you don't believe, well, like retired pharmaceutical scientist Paul G. King PhD, who has shown that the govt and the vax pushers have NEVER abided by the statutes that mandate "safer" vaccines. He's just a kook. Or is he: www.Dr-King.com

Or, if you are like Andrew Wakefield, MD, a respected gastrointestinal expert and you notice the connection between vaccines and diseases of the gut, and publish about it, be prepared to be destroyed.

And, even after Dr. Wakefield was vindicated (it turns out that it was a crony Murdock (a Merck director) shill "journalist" who faked the records to "prove" Dr. Wakefield's citations (sic) "fraudulent" who was the culprit, and although the rag he worked for was shut down, his lies are continually repeated by people who don't take the time to learn what really happened.

They just trust the cronies. They trust the govt. They pretend to be "libertarians."

The truth is that there is no valid "vaccine science" that is not tainted by crony corporatism. The truth is that there is no free market in vaccines.

The truth is that in a libertarian society the vax drug pushers would be the same uninsurable risk that they are in this statist society, but they couldn't use the force of the state to impose their fake science and use their Congress to take away from us our right to redress for the foreseeable harms of vaccination.

Listen up, so-called "libertarians" who want the force of the state to make us shoot toxins into our children. Very few of you have children of your own. I know. Very few of you have ever dealt with Amish or homeschooled children who are not vaccinated. You haven't really ever seen clear-eyed, clear-minded children not injured by vaccination and govt schools.

You weren't in Prince Georges County in Maryland in 2007 when the govt rounded-up thousands of children, herded them into a court house, surrounded by police lines, police dogs, for forced vaccination (never telling the parents about medical or religious exemptions). Over 700 of those kids were double-vaccinated 'cause the govt school system had lost the records... why? to make sure the school got its full dose of Federal Funds (BTW, the prosecutor admitted he did not vaccinate his children, nor did his State Legislator wife, as vaccines are too dangerous).**

You don't really understand what it means to be a parent is you think we'd risk our children based on your trust in crony "science." You state you believe that we have self-ownership, but you are willing to compromise when the govt tells you that there is an epidemic. You sanction the use of its militarized police to force vaccinations.

You parrot all the disreputable statist arguments for forcing people to do or not do this or that.

You hide behind your belief in the trustworthiness of govt "public health". Yet that same system approves dangerous drugs that, by some estimates, kill over 750.000 Americans every year when properly prescribed and used.

You fail to see how you are being used to further the globalist elite's depopulation agenda.

(Bill Gates: "When properly used... vaccinations... can reduce world population by 15%..." TED Talk. Google it.)

Apparently even some "libertarians" can be useful idiots for global tyranny.

Right now Dr. Rima is reading a paper at an All India Congress on Medical Education entitled "Regulation and Results" about how the crony system of "health care" devastates health, using vaccination as the example. See her lecture: http://tinyurl.com/DrRimaIndiaPaper.

This is politically important because India is a major target of the depopulationists. One example from Dr. Rima's Paper, after a huge and expensive Polio Vax Campaign India was declared "Polio Free." Only one problem, instead of a few thousand cases of Polio a year, there are now over 50,000 cases annually of "Non-Polio Paralysis" - a new disease that only seems to afflict the vaccinated.

Dr. Rima shows that vaccines typically kill and maim more people than they theoretically "save." Read her paper here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/Final-All-India-Medical-Congress-Paper.020415.pdf

The science is not settled. Claims by govt and its crony corporations should be viewed with great skepticism.

Claims by alleged libertarians that it is somehow acceptable to use the force of the state to make people undergo medical interventions against their beliefs and will is nothing less than intellectual thuggery. It violates the Helsinki Declaration on Medical Experimentation.

When that belief in the safety and efficacy of coerced vaccination results in mass infertility, chronic disease and death the proponents are, to paraphrase Lysandor Spooner,  nothing less than tyrants and murderers.

Stop it now! http://tinyurl.com/VaccinationIsViolation

Dr. Ron Paul, the Conscience of the Constitution, just expressed his opposition to vaccine mandates: http://libertycrier.com/vaccine-controversy-shows-need-markets-not-mandates/
--------------

* The Global Health Security Initiative says the most cost effective way to prevent pandemics is to have less "vectors and victims..." Mega death to prevent.... what? http://tinyurl.com/EndGHSI

** See the Tiburon Declaration: http://drrimatruthreports.com/tiburon-declaration-on-compulsory-vaccination/

An Open Letter to the Judge

A Letter to Fox News
Commentator Andrew Napolitano

UPDATE: HERE IS JUDGE NAP'S REASONED DEFENSE OF LIBERTY REGARDING VACCINES:

http://www.judgenap.com/index.php?post=to-vaccinate-or-not-to-vaccinate

------------------------

February 3, 2015 
.

Dear Judge Napolitano,

A group of health freedom advocates and I have been communicating about the current mass propaganda push for mandated vaccines. They are copied on this note. We need your help.

Dr. Rima (with General Bert) is in India right now, learning about Ayurvedic Natural Solutions and about to present a paper to the All India Medical Congress entitled "Regulation and Results" which will expose the dangerous lies of the vax pushers, describing in detail how vax toxins harm millions, literally killing more than they theoretically "save." Her presentation is February 8th and we will release her powerful paper then.

Here is the abstract:

With even Rand Paul and John Stossel making odd sounds about "government's role in promoting vaccination..." you may be the last voice of sanity in the mass media.

With newspapers like USA Today calling for jail for vaccine resistors, and allegedly pro-free speech publications like Reason and The Guardian calling for blocking vaccine refusers' access to the media, the public is hearing only the drum-beat for forced vaccines.

This would be a real disaster, leading to more chronic illness and mass infertility (maybe the globalist elite's core goal?).

Dr. Rima's paper shows that children who are exposed, naturally, to the self-limiting childhood diseases have stronger immune systems and less chronic disease later in life.

The facts are clear, for anyone without a special interest to plead, hygiene and nutrition ended the pandemic diseases, not mass public vaccination.

But in addition to the question of safety, we need to address the question of legality.

Let's start with the case often cited as the “lead case” in vaccination law, Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). This case is often erroneously cited as authority for mandatory vaccinations.

The case is rather more nuanced and announces compelling authority for Federal Court intervention in vaccination matters. While giving due deference to the State authorities, the Supreme Court reserved for the Federal Courts the right to intervene in matters where health and life may be at stake: “…if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that he is not at the time a fit subject of vaccination or that vaccination, by reason of his then condition, would seriously impair his health or probably cause his death.”  

While Jacobson did not prevail in the Supreme Court, it is to be noted that he never alleged harm or peril of harm; he only alleged that the mandating of the emergency influenza vaccination was ultra vires the state’s authority and the $5.00 fine imposed was unconstitutional. Jacobson was never actually forced to be vaccinated and history shows us that the $5.00 fine was later vacated. Furthermore, the case was decided before the comprehensive Federal pre-emption of drug approval that is now embodied in the laws empowering the FDA.

Vaccination is Violation. Nothing less. http://tinyurl.com/vaccinationisviolation 

It is not enough to defend the right of the person to make what the govt alleges is "bad choice" of not vaccinating. [The wrong here is compelling what may be unsafe medical interventions. There will be foreseeable harm to people who are forced to accept the shot; such compulsion negates their status as free people.]

That certainly is the position the Supreme Court has taken, in, for example, Thompson vs Western States (535 U.S. 357, 2002) when Justice O'Connor wrote:

"If the First Amendment means anything, it means that regulating speech must be a last - not first - resort. *** We have previously rejected the notion that the Government has an interest in preventing the dissemination of truthful commercial information in order to prevent members of the public from making bad decisions with the information. *** Even if the Government did argue that it had an interest in preventing misleading advertisements, this interest could be satisfied by the far less restrictive alternative of requiring ... a warning ..."

Congress adopted the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq.) precisely because vaccines do cause harm and are uninsurable. The legal maxim, “No harm without a remedy” applies here and the Supreme Court in Jacobson instructs that it is not to be understood to be holding “that the judiciary would not be competent to interfere and protect the health and life of the individual concerned.” Approval of any drug (including a vaccine) by Federal Authority is now a necessary prerequisite for that drug to be lawfully available to the public in commerce. Such approval is a necessary prerequisite for any state mandate for the forced use of any such drug, since Jacobson holds that the courts should intervene if there is "reasonable certainty" that a person is "unfit" for inoculation since the procedure would "seriously impair... health..." Without the statutorily required showing of safety, we cannot have any reasonable certainty, thus no mandate can lawfully issue.

But none of these medical, philosophical or legal issues are being heard. Only the propaganda for mass, forced vaccination is being parroted by all the media, CNBC and Fox like. Only pro-vax voices are being heard, in a unanimous chorus led by the likes of Hillary Clinton but sadly joined by people who should know better, like John Stossel and Dr. Rand Paul!

All of the people who are receiving this email are very knowledgeable about vaccination. We are each available for media interviews, and many of us live in the NYC area.

Please let us know how we can help you bring the news of our dissenting voices to the media.

Best personal regards,

Ralph Fucetola JD

Natural Solutions Trustee

PS: Dr. Rima's India Trip Notes here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=22495

Proud Anti-Vax! New Podcast Video

Be A Vaccine Refuser With Me!
ANTI-VAX & PROUD!

Here is a new video podcast featuring Dr. Rima and the Vitamin Lawyer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWHHxW-pm8Q&feature=share&list=UUpgvIebAMVqdN8kvYxzLBfw

What You Need to Know About Your Legal Rights as a Vaccine Refuser

#vaccinationISviolation

Message Your Representatives Here:
http://tinyurl.com/vacccinationISviolation

Natural Solutions Foundation
"Be a Vaccine Refuser with Me" -- Legal Considerations
http://tinyurl.com/VaccineFree

Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine (US ARmy, Ret), President of the Natural Solutions Foundation, and Rima E. Laibow, MD, Medical Director have invited us all to become Vaccine Refusers with them. I am Counsel and Trustee of the Foundation and am proud to say, I've become a Vaccine Refuser with them.

This article discusses my understanding of the legal considerations of that position, as Counsel to the Foundation. In my case, I base my refusal on my sincerely-held religious beliefs, but others may have had a prior adverse reaction or other medical condition, such as Genome Disruption Syndrome, which provides a medical contraindication to further vaccinations.

  People are concerned about the consequences of being a Vaccine Refuser. It is my considered professional opinion as an attorney that, under the US Constitution, you have an inalienable right to control your own body and what is done with your body. You are a free person, not a slave.

 Let's start with the case often cited as the “lead case” in vaccination law, Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). This case is often erroneously cited as authority for mandatory vaccinations.

 The case is rather more nuanced and announces compelling authority for Federal Court intervention in vaccination matters. While giving due deference to the State authorities, the Supreme Court reserved for the Federal Courts the right to intervene in matters where health and life may be at stake: “…if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that he is not at the time a fit subject of vaccination or that vaccination, by reason of his then condition, would seriously impair his health or probably cause his death.” 

While Jacobson did not prevail in the Supreme Court, it is to be noted that he never alleged harm or peril of harm; he only alleged that the mandating of the emergency influenza vaccination was ultra vires the state’s authority and the $5.00 fine imposed was unconstitutional. Jacobson was never actually forced to be vaccinated and history shows us that the $5.00 fine was later vacated. Furthermore, the case was decided before the comprehensive Federal pre-emption of drug approval that is now embodied in the laws empowering the FDA.

It is the failure of the Federal authorities to abide by existing legal requirements that drugs be "safe and effective" and that new vaccines be safer than older vaccines that gave rise to litigation in which the Foundation was involved during the 2009 Swine Flu Vaccine Panic. That litigation, in state and federal courts, led to the collapse of the 2009 vaccine mandates. The argument for Federal court action in the face of a potential for the vaccines to “seriously impair” health for those who are mandated to receive the vaccines, is far stronger now than it might have been a hundred years ago, before the meta-studies and other experience that shows the potential harm that wide-spread vaccination must cause.

See Dr. Rima E. Laibow, MD's blog entry on the Flu Vax: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=13155 and her entry on the "Smoking Gun - They always knew vaccines were dangerous" - http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=13456 . 

Congress adopted the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq.) precisely because vaccines do cause harm and are uninsurable. The legal maxim, “No harm without a remedy” applies here and the Supreme Court in Jacobson instructs that it is not to be understood to be holding “that the judiciary would not be competent to interfere and protect the health and life of the individual concerned.” Approval of any drug (including a vaccine) by Federal Authority is now a necessary prerequisite for that drug to be lawfully available to the public in commerce. Such approval is a necessary prerequisite for any state mandate for the forced use of any such drug, since Jacobson holds that the courts should intervene if there is "reasonable certainty" that a person is "unfit" for inoculation since the procedure would "seriously impair... health..." Without the statutorily required showing of safety, we cannot have any reasonable certainty, thus no mandate can issue.

  Individuals and families have a number of lawful alternatives to vaccines. There has been a nearly universal adoption of religious exemption laws. Medical excuses are also universally available.

 Additionally, during a pandemic, individuals and families have a clear right under American legal practice and under international law to self-shield. Voluntary, at-home self-shielding and (if necessary) self-quarantine are viable, practical and easily available alternatives to mandated vaccination, isolation or incarceration in relocation centers during a declared “pandemic emergency.” Since the process is entirely voluntary, it preserves the rights and freedoms of the people and families choosing to self-shield.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) states that Quarantine is usually defined as “to separate and restrict the movement of well persons who may have been exposed to a communicable disease to see if they become ill.” (the proper term regarding persons who have already become ill is “Isolation.”) The Red Cross tells us, “…both quarantine and isolation may be compelled on a mandatory basis through legal authority as well as conducted on a voluntary basis.” Self-shielding is taking voluntary steps to shield oneself and family from exposure to potential pathogens (or toxins or untested and uninsurable vaccines) while self-quarantine is when someone who has been exposed takes voluntary steps to separate from others (such people who exhibit symptoms are said to be in “isolation’).

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts, “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home … Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference…”

The National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza concludes “limitations on gatherings, or quarantine authority may be an appropriate public health intervention.” And the Red Cross also states, “Modern quarantine includes a range of disease control strategies that may be used individually or in combination, including: Short-term, voluntary home curfew…” And finally, the Department of Defense, in its planning, states, “Quarantine… applies to the separation and restriction of movement of well persons presumed to have been exposed to a contagion. Quarantine may be enacted at a home or other residential facility. It may also be voluntary or mandatory.”

Quarantine therefore has a significant legal foundation, and the law recognizes the existence of voluntary self-quarantine or self-shielding at home. The primary issue then is, “How does one prepare for at home self-shielding?”

In 2009 (during the Swine Flu Vaccine Panic) Natural Solutions Foundation published checklists and similar information to allow families to plan for self-shielding. You can see that information here: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2752 -- the citations used in this article may be found there.

General Bert Stubblebine, Foundation President sees a potential for a new 2012/13 influenza vaccine panic leading to an engineered pandemic: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=13402.

Every family, every individual, has a right to refuse medical treatments that violate conscience. This is clear from the Helsinki Declaration.

Self-shielding in one’s home, a location recognized in common law as inviolate except with proper judicial authority, is a right that should be respected by governments as they deal with the results of their ill-conceived public health policies. Self-shielding can be as simple as taking steps to reduce your exposure to pathogens, supporting your immune system through good nutrition and using supplementation such as nano-silver, avoiding public places, especially crowded locations, and similar common sense steps. These steps offer you significant protection from the dangers of a natural or weaponized pandemic, while an uninsurable “Pig in a Poke” vaccine may only offer you the opportunity to come to harm. We believe “Do No Harm” is the first rule of good health. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts,

“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home … Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference…”

If you exercise your personal sovereignty over your own body and stand your ground, proudly, as a Vaccine Refuser, you now know you can do so with justice on your side.

Help educate state and national legislators about your right to be a Vaccine Refuser: http://tinyurl.com/VaccineFree.

Ralph Fucetola JD
Trustee and Counsel Natural Solutions Foundation