Tuesday, August 25, 2015

History and Politics of Federal Vaccine Intervention

History and Politics of Federal Vaccine Intervention* 

Tell Decision Makers No Forced Vaccines! 
Protect Vaccine Conscientious Objectors 
Please Share with this link: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=24914 . 

VACCINATION: Dictionary.Reference.com definition: "Noun, Medicine/Medical. The act or practice of vaccinating; inoculation with vaccine." Inoculate is relevantly defined as: "Verb - 1. to implant (a disease agent or antigen) in a person, animal, or plant to produce a disease for study or to stimulate disease resistance." 

Vaccination as a medical practice arose in Europe at about the same time as homeopathy, during the early 1700s. The practice may have also arisen in the mid 1500's in China. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination#History

Is vaccination safe and effective? The efficacy of vaccination has been challenged by holistic physicians. See, for example, http://tinyurl.com/DrRimaIndiaPaper

Vaccination has been determined to be "unavoidably unsafe" Bruesewitz vs Wyeth.

One of the primary ways the federal government is able to make policies for the states is when it makes the states dependent on federal money. But before the money can flow, there must be a perceived problem that only government is thought to be able to address.

The first widely noted Federal intervention into the vaccine issue was in 1905 in the case of Jacobson v Massachusetts. In my view the case stands for the proposition that the Federal Courts have power to intervene in vaccine matters when the safety of the recipient is at risk. I discuss that case in more detail here: http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/2015/02/an-open-letter-to-judge.html

But let's start some time later, in 1976 when the First Swine Flu Panic happened. We were warned about a deadly new flu that would be "worse than 1918" -- the Great Influenza Pandemic** -- and the public bought into the vaccine company propaganda, reinforced by dire CDC pronouncements. Millions lined up for the shot; hundreds died; no pandemic materialized and the vaxx companies, facing hundreds of law suits, pulled the toxic brew from the market. Vaccine drugs were shown to be uninsurable risks.

So what it Big Pharma do? It went to Congress and cajoled its well-paid politicians, and threatened to stop making vaccines unless Congress protected the industry from the laws of the marketplace. 

[BTW, a few decades later, when the herb Ephedra was linked to three deaths of people who were at high risk and abused the herb, and the insurance companies told the vitamin companies there would be no insurance coverage for Ephedra, the companies did not slink off to Congress with threats and bribes; rather, the industry stopped providing the product. The market spoke; the companies responded.] 

In the case of vaccination, however, Congress went to work for its crony paymasters and the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was born.

We lost our rights to sue for the foreseeable harms of vaccination. Now consider HR-2232, pending in Congress (below). This new bill threatens to withhold grants to state departments of health if they retain religious and philosophical exemptions to mandated vaccines. Consider also what the government might not have known in the mid 1980s: vaccines must cause harm -- which is what it knows now, since the Supreme Court told it, that vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe." 

Consider that the new Federal forced vaxx bill, HR-2232, means there would be a strong economic incentive for states to rescind existing philosophical and religious conscientious objection
exemptions, and make sure medical waivers are not easy to obtain. We discuss that bill in more detail here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/congress-to-punish-states-that-protect-vaxx-conscientious-objectors/

How did the federal government manage to get involved in vaccine funding? That was legislation known as NCVIA of 1986. 

The bill made federal taxpayers liable (thru arbitration) to pay tort claims against corporations that manufacture vaccines in the US. . The bill [as adopted] expressly prohibited tort lawsuits against vaccine makers. Some public figures such as Dr. Anthony Morris explained that the bill would be a disaster for parents. They warned that once the federal government has an economic stake in something, it believes it has the license to make policy on that something. 

[BTW, although I use the pronoun "it" when referring to government, we do understand that we are talking about specific people engaging in specific human action; there is no "government" doing this; there are plenty of human persons acting as though they were automatons under the control of some collective entity they call "government." Moral choices are always individual choices.]

Soon after the bill was adopted and the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was established, CDC forced states to adopt vigorous mandates for school vaccination, or else lose federal money. Just like Rep. Wilson's bill HR 2232 is doing now with respect to religious and philosophical exemptions.

There was great naivete in trusting the CDC to make vaccines safer; to believe that drug companies, relieved of legal responsibility would make vaccines safer. 

Some who believed in vaccine efficacy were alarmed that the normal market forces "prevented" vaccine makers from getting their dangerous products insured. To them, that was a bad thing! . But to many parents, it was a good thing. Unsafe products should not be sold. The free market worked. But those who believed in the efficacy of government action (sometimes referred to as "statists") threw a monkey wrench in the works.

What they ended up doing was not only getting unsafe products to market, but making them compulsory (for school), and making the producers free from all legal liability. . Only someone with unlimited faith in government benevolence could do such a thing. One who believes in "the common good" and "government knows best" with "one-size-fits-all" policies.***

We saw the same process of threatening removal of Federal government funding used to commit a horrid vaccine atrocity in 2007. It too is part of the backstory for what is unfolding in Congress, as are the recent adoption of a forced vaxx law in California (SB277) and the defeat of such laws in several other states. 

In 2007 Prince Georges County, a majority Black county, found that significant federal funding was about to be lost due to low vaccine rates. Over a thousand children, and their parents, were summonsed to the County Court where a State's Attorney who did not vaccinate his own children ("too dangerous") oversaw, with a State Judge, the vaccination, sometimes for a second time as the schools had lost the records, of hundreds of children. The parents were not informed of their basic human right to Informed Consent nor were they told of Maryland's vaccine exemptions. They were herded into Court between lines of police with dogs. No child's medical history was taken. More about that here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/tiburon-declaration-on-compulsory-vaccination/ 

That's what Rep. Wilson's bill would do, initially to all Head Start children. 

And entirely based on the use of Federal Funds, taken from the Taxpayers, and dangled before State, County and Local officials. That it is unlawful to force someone to surrender a right (such as the right to Informed Consent) to receive a public benefit does not seem to have been even considered by the vaxx pushers. . Thus in 1954 the Supreme Court unambiguously held that government could not do this. Speiser v Randall -- the Doctrine of Unconstitutional Conditions is discussed in detail here: http://www.rbs2.com/duc.pdf

Alas, the history of bad Federal policy decisions regarding vaccination continues before and after Rep. Wilson's bill. Back in 2009 was the Second Swine Flu Panic... this one involving about $7 billion Taxpayer Dollars wasted on the unsafety tested vaccine which very few people were willing to accept. With 3.5 million emails generated through our Educate Decision Makers system and mass refusal to cooperate, the whole program floundered when efforts to mandate the vaccine for First Responders failed.

And in recent weeks, after the minor measles outbreak, among the vaccinated, at California Disneyland early in 2015, we have the formerly-pro-choice Gov. of California signed the draconian SB277, abrogating our conscientious objector rights in California, joined during the past few days by the two US Senators from California who want Federal vaccine mandates for all...

Tell Decision Makers No Forced Vaccines! Here: http://tinyurl.com/vaccinationISviolation Protect Vaccine Conscientious Objectors .
New House bill creates federal vaccine mandate All federally-recommended shots required, no parental exemptions. Here is what Capwiz Issues says about the bill: . Florida Congresswoman Frederica S. Wilson (D-24) has introduced a bill, House Resolution H.R. 2232, that will require all states to mandate all students enrolled in public schools receive all the vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Policy, a federal body compromised of vaccine-industry representatives, which includes vaccines for HPV, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, Paul Offit?s rota virus vaccine, annual flu shots, and dozens of others. States that do not comply will not be eligible for grants for "preventive health services" under the Public Health Services Act. . And please call Rep. Wilson's office in Washington, DC, and let them know politely why this bill is a bad idea: Rep. Frederica S. Wilson, 202-225-4506 . Wilson's bill, if passed, would for the first time establish a federal vaccination requirement to attend school. Current vaccines policies are set by the states, but with the increasing federal control over schools with No Child Left Behind and the Common Core, Wilson?s bill maybe an indicator of what is coming. This bill would also deliver to the vaccine industry two of their primary goals: completely removing any parental involvement in vaccine decisions for our children, and requiring the entire ACIP schedule, which no state currently does. . Exemptions would not be allowed for either religious or secular reasons. Medical exemptions are quite tenuously allowed provided a physician submits a letter demonstrating (to the satisfaction of the individual in charge of the health program at the student's school) that the physician's opinion conforms to the accepted standard of medical care. So the final authority rests with the person in charge of the health program at the school who probably would not be a physician, and this language obviously allows the physician's judgment to be overridden by anyone who disagrees with the exemption, regardless of that person's qualifications. They aren't even required to examine the child, or even the child?s medical records before overriding a physician. . As a Democrat in the House there is little likelihood Wilson's bill will pass. As of today it has no co-sponsors, but similar legislation with stronger support may emerge and we must act to protect our rights and our children. This would be an unprecedented expansion of the federal government into an area of law and policy long recognized as the preserve of the states. . The bill would allow anyone, without any medical training, to override the medical decision of a physician. . It ignores the principle of informed choice as the bedrock of any ethical medical procedure, and eliminates any parental say over what is injected into their child's body. . It violates the ethical code of the American Academy of Pediatrics, which requires that vaccines should be administered only to minors with the informed consent of a child's parents. . This bill is wildly out of line with existing state policy, 48 of which allow religious exemptions, and 19 states, where more than half of the American population lives, allow exemptions for secular reasons, essentially providing the parent final say on what is injected into their children's bodies. . H. R. 2232 defies the de facto vaccine standard of the developed democracies, which allow parents to make the final choice. There are no such things as required vaccines in Canada, Japan, Germany, the UK, Ireland, Israel, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, etc. [Recently Israel joined the few jurisdictions that condition receipt of government support on childhood vaccination, apparently forgetting about the Nuremberg Code. RF]
Please share this message with friends and family and please post to social networks.

Tell Decision Makers No Forced Vaccines! 
Protect Vaccine Conscientious Objectors

* - We thank Gary Krasner of the Coalition for Informed Choice -- www.cfic.us -- for some of the "insider information" that formed the basis for this historical review... but it's not just history, because bad policy choices of three decades ago allow the bad policy choices of the present to continue. RF

** It is instructive to note that the 1918 Great Flu Pandemic that killed as many as 50 million people at the end of WWI appears to have been an example of a "perfect storm" unleashed against the war-weakened population of Europe, spreading to the rest of the world. If one were a eugenocidal maniac who wanted to trigger a pandemic, 1918 is the case study.

Since it has been proven that better nutrition, hygiene and sanitation (not vaccines) defeated the pandemic diseases [see: http://drrimatruthreports.com/pro-vaxx-statistics-lie/ ] the way to start a pandemic is to start with a weakened population (like, say, the war-wrecked population of West Africa just before the recent Ebola outbreak) with low levels of nutrition, hygiene and sanitation, and then send viral vectors at them [yes, we are all "vectors and victims" of pandemics; see: http://tinyurl.com/EndGHSI ].

That's what happened in 1918. Thousands of US soldiers were given an experimental live flu vaccine during basic training. Then they were given the new wonder drug aspirin to control the resulting fevers (preventing the fever from curing the flu; allowing the viruses to mutate into a more virulent version). Then they and their horses and the pigs and chickens they were to eat were herded onto cattle cars and the like, shipped cross-country to ports of debarkation where they were all crowded into ships for a long trip to Europe.

Once in war-ravaged Europe the troops went through war exercises in Spain where, among other stressors, they were subjected to mustard gas training. And so the Spanish Flu started... the perfect storm.

 *** The trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation find themselves agreeing with Gary Krasner's insider information and mirror his views in some of the language in this article.