Vitamin Lawyer Health Freedom Blog

White Paper in Support of UN & Agency Review

An Open Letter to the Secretary of State

To the Hon. Marco Rubio, United States Secretary of State and to the
United States Ambassador-Designate to the United Nations, the Hon. Elise Stefanik

Contents

0.1 Introduction|
1.0 What is the United Nations and What are its Agendas?
1.1 United Nations Agencies and Programs Contrary to US interests
1.2 The UN Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR) is Contrary to our Constitutional Rights.
1.3 History of Senate ‘Consent’ to UN Charter, which was not a Treaty, in 1945.|
1.4 The Act to appoint a UN Ambassador and provide for US participation.
1.5 The unilateral authority of the President to withdraw from the UN.
2.0 Conclusion.

0.1 Introduction

The United Nations and its Agencies and Programs are Contrary to US interests, Constitution and sovereignty.

Eighty years and countless dollars of participation have demonstrated its destructive impact on every aspect of our Nation’s life. The Secretary of State and the Ambassador are urged, in the strongest possible terms, to recommend to the President the United States immediate withdrawal from the UN and all its agencies, programs and operations.

Pursuant to Executive Order of February 4, 2025, requiring the Secretary of State and the United Nations (UN) Ambassador to review and report to the President on international bodies, this White Paper is designed to provide detailed information about the incompatibility of continued United States’ membership in the UN and all of its constituent organizations, programs and activities from a Constitutional, cultural, economic, health and values-based vantage point.

This White Paper will examine:

1. The history of UN, its agencies and programs, showing that they are comprehensively contrary to the interests of the United States.

2. The UN Declaration of Human Rights, showing that it is antithetical to our Constitution and Bill of Rights, abrogating our fundamental inalienable rights.

3. The history of fraudulent and Unconstitutional Senate ‘consent’ to, and supposed ratification of, the UN Charter in 1945 when it was misrepresented to the Senate as a Treaty.

4. The Unconstitutional, unlawful and expensive expansion of US participation in the UN and its subsidiaries far exceeds the enabling legislation of 1945 which appointed a UN Ambassador and, thus, circumscribed US participation.

5. The unilateral authority vested in the President to withdraw from the UN absent Congressional, Judicial, Legislative or International direction, decision or control.

We begin with Agenda 2030, its predecessors and successors:

Following adoption of Agenda 21[1] at the Rio United Nations Conference on Environment and Biodiversity[2] , comprehensive reorganization of every aspect of human society was initiated by the United Nations through its member states and their political subdivisions.

When progress was unsatisfactorily slow, another set of goals and programs, known as Agenda 2030,[3] was adopted by the United Nations’ membership. On June 13, 2019, the UN-Forum Partnership, between the UN and the Word Economic Forum (WEF), a private economic development organization, was formalized to “to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” specifying that the partnership “identifies six areas of focus – financing the 2030 Agenda, climate change, health, digital cooperation, gender equality and empowerment of women, education and skills – to strengthen and broaden their combined impact by building on existing and new collaborations”, offering a private organization nearly unlimited influence and control over global policies and implementations reaching into every aspect of human life, planet-wide.

The fundamental principles upon which this comprehensive reorganization of society is based is naked Marxism: central control of the means of production, workers and distribution for the supposed benefit of all and the actual benefit only of the most powerful.[4]

According to both the United Nations and its partner, the World Economic Forum (WEF), human rights are a useless relic of the past, based on a “fairytale we tell ourselves”[5] and most of the population of the world is “unnecessary”, easily replaced by machines. Those people remaining will, through BioDigital Convergence[6],[7],[8] be quite literally rendered subunits of the machine.[9]

Restricted to a tiny radius of free movement under constant surveillance, limited to “alternative”
proteins, the denizens of UN/WEF supported “15-minute cities”[10],[11] it is hard to reconcile the right to either life or liberty with the comprehensive, draconian and minutely controlled existence “permitted” by the masters of every aspect of their fate with these well-articulated plans. But they are, indeed, fully consistent with the ultimate destruction of our guaranteed freedoms in exchange for the total control of a Marxist society envisioned and being rapidly implemented with US tax dollars by the dogmatically and consistently anti-freedom United Nations.

Depopulation is, and always has been, a central part of the United Nations’ aspirations, at least since 1974,[12] continuing and accelerating through the present via comprehensive implementation of Agenda 2030.

In partnership with WEF, the UN has decided that the world they wish to dominate and govern “needs” very few of us. Those of us remaining will be neutralized individually and collectively, reduced to prisoners in confined environments.

President Trump’s Executive order of 4 February 2025 was described by the White House as:

"The Executive Order also requires the Secretary of State to review and report to the President on which international organizations, conventions, or treaties promote radical or anti-American sentiment." [13]

The Order provides:

"Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary, in consultation with the UN Ambassador, shall conduct a review of all international intergovernmental organizations of which the United States is a member and provides any type of funding or other support, and all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party, to determine which organizations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States and whether such organizations, conventions, or treaties can be reformed. "[14]

1.0 What is the United Nations and What are its Agendas?

The contents of this White Paper are intended to provide significant backgrounder information to justify a review not only of the UN’s agencies and programs, but of the UN itself, but of continued United States participation in the UN itself: does this organization supports the values of the United States? Is it ‘contrary to the interests’ of the United States? It is, and we submit, the United States ought to withdraw from the UN.

Presenting itself as benign and helpful, the UN has successfully propagandized itself into a position of psychological and political near invulnerability since its creation in 1945. Meanwhile, the sinister reality of its actual agenda for comprehensive world domination has proceeded nearly unnoticed by most of us.

For Agenda 2030 / The Great Reset to come into full effect by the year 2030:

· Vast numbers of people must die, making an almost endless number of “Vaccines” necessary

· Virtually all farms and livestock must be destroyed, making “alternative proteins” and synthetic “food” necessary

· All privately owned vehicles must be banned, making 15-minute cities necessary

· Dissent must be criminalized, making comprehensive surveillance and censorship necessary

· All production and distribution must be centralized, making confiscation of private property necessary

· Economic activity must be monitored and controlled, making digital currency necessary

· Reproduction must be controlled and suppressed, making destruction of fertility necessary

Despite consistent positive propaganda spin, like USAID, UN programs serve the UN’s programmatic agenda, which differs markedly at every point from our Constitutional form of government.

Actually means:

1.1 United Nations Agencies and Programs Contrary to US interests

Agenda 2030 is a brilliantly articulated, comprehensive plan to destroy every facet of human society and, indeed, humanity itself. Its target is total world domination, control and ownership. Through a series of specialized corporations such as:

· World Health Organization (WHO)

· United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF)

· United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

· International Labor Organization (ILO)

· World Trade Organization (WTO)

· International Monetary Fund (IMF)

· Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)

No aspect of private, political or community life remains intact once Agenda 2030 is implemented. Full worldwide operationalization is scheduled for 2030, a mere five years away.

The UN is the source of numerous tyrannical and anti-American subsidiary organizations and programs, which have been operating for decades inside the US and internationally to the serious detriment of the US. The US taxpayer has footed a substantial portion of the bills for activities working directly against US interests, values, beliefs and needs.

Utilizing vast public relations budgets, the UN and its agencies launder Marxist ideas and policies by filtering them through its many minion organizations and programs, sanitizing them with distorted and distorting Orwellian language to ensure our cooperation in the destruction of our own bodies, families and societies. This is done as a technique to create a false perception of authority and consensus, as well as diffusing the accountability for UN directives which are woven into US policy at every level of governance.

1.2 The UN Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR) is Contrary to our Constitutional Rights.

The language of the UNDHR typically sets forth a ‘right’ or ‘freedom’ and then allows restrictions on same, ‘as provided by law’ – there are no inalienable rights under the UN system, contrary to the provisions of the US Constitution, such as Amendment One which prohibits any law restricting freedom of speech, religion and assembly. This example from the end of the UNDHR shows the intent to subordinate our inalienable rights to UN dominance:

Article 29

[1] Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

[2] In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

[3] These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. [Emphasis added]

1.3 History of Senate ‘Consent’ to UN Charter, which was not a Treaty, in 1945.

There are no signatories, either national or individual, to the UN Charter bound, as if by a “Treaty”, to either the UN or its Member States, nor can there be.

Facts & Law:

[A] At the end of World War Two the victorious powers negotiated the establishment of a successor to the League of Nations, to be called the “United Nations.” The UN Conference in San Francisco, in the spring and early summer of 1945, following the defeat of Nazi Germany, adopted the Charter and it was opened for signatures. President Truman was present at the Conference when the US Secretary of State signed the Charter, June 26, 1945. [15]

[B] In Article 110 the Charter requires its ratification:

1. The present Charter shall be ratified by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.

2. The ratifications shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all the signatory states of each deposit as well as the Secretary-General of the Organization when he has been appointed.

3. The present Charter shall come into force upon the deposit of ratifications by the Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America, and by a majority of the other signatory states. A protocol of the ratifications deposited shall thereupon be drawn up by the Government of the United States of America which shall communicate copies thereof to all the signatory states.[16]

[C] Harry S. Truman, the President of the United States, and a former Senator, personally took the Charter to the US Senate asking for ‘advice and consent’ to join the United Nations.

[D] On July 28, 1945 the Senate held a Roll Call vote, as the Congressional Record shows:[17]

The Congressional Record states:

“Two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein, the resolution of ratification is agreed to, and the treaty is ratified.”

[E] The US State Department, as official Depository, has published a document showing the ratifications of the original members. This excerpt shows the initial US signing of the Charter by the Secretary of State in June of 1945 and the date in August of 1945 when President Truman signed the Charter while he was in Europe at the Potsdam Conference.[18]

[F] While the National Archives shows a photo of President Truman signing the actual Charter on August 8, 1945. There is no record of a formal “Instrument of Ratification” on file with the Depository, as required by the Charter itself.[19],[20]

[G] The US Constitution provides, Article VI:

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby”

[H] The Vienna Convention on Treaties (VCLT) defines Treaties as contracts between sovereign states.

” Article 1 – Scope of the present Convention

The present Convention applies to treaties between States.

Article 3 – International agreements not within the scope of the present Convention

The fact that the present Convention does not apply to international agreements concluded between States and other subjects of international law…”⁷

[I] Congress initially adopted the UN Participation Act in 1945⁸ after President Truman signed the Charter. While the Act provides for an ambassador-rank US Representative appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate it does not authorize US participation in the United Nations.

Discussion: The United States relationship with the UN is unconstitutional, conceived in deceit, maintained in deceit and is thus ultra vires.

Harry S. Truman assumed the office of President of the United States when President Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945. Previously he had been Vice-President of the United States and President of the Senate, of which he had been a member prior to becoming Vice-President.

In an unprecedented act, Truman personally presented the United Nations Charter to the US Senate and spoke to the body in favor of participating in the UN. He stated, among other points:

“I am appearing to ask for the ratification of the Charter… in accordance with the Constitution. … For this is not a static treaty…” (Emphasis added)[21]

Although the President pro tem of the Senate inaccurately characterized the Charter of the United Nations as a “treaty” the President of the United States specified it was not a “treaty.”

[22]

This inconsistency suggests that the Senate was misinformed regarding the nature of the document. This situation is further exposed by the US State Department’s official compendium of Treaties in Force[23] and its supplement[24] which do not list the UN Charter as a Treaty in force.

The Vienna Convention on Treaties is clear: international agreements, such as Charters, are not treaties.[25]

Therefore, by the preponderance of relevant authorities, the Charter is not a treaty. Despite the incorrect use of the word “treaty” in the Congressional Record, UN decisions do not trigger the “Supreme Law of the Land” clause of the Constitution. The UN Charter was conceived, presented and maintained by deceit. Any action by the US Government in furtherance of participation is ultra vires and void as unconstitutional.

Thus, State (and local) governments are not bound to follow UN dictates, including those issued by such subsidiary UN bodies as the World Health Organization.

The Charter explicitly differentiates between ‘Treaties’ and ‘international agreements’, stipulating that any Treaty brought before the UN must be registered with the Secretariat. The facts further show that no signatory to the UN Charter is bound, as if by a “Treaty”, to either the UN or its Member States. Nations which conclude the same international agreement do not enter into a Treaty among themselves by so doing. Section 102 of the Charter, the only Article referencing Treaties, states:

1. Every treaty and every international agreement entered into by any Member of the United Nations after the present Charter comes into force shall as soon as possible be registered with the Secretariat and published by it.

2. No party to any such treaty or international agreement which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article may invoke that treaty or agreement before any organ of the United Nations.[26]

The deception continues even today, since the US State Department erroneously refers to the UN Charter as a “multilateral treaty”.

“The United States is depositary for over 200 multilateral treaties – including, for example, the Charter of the United Nations, The Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the North Atlantic Treaty. In its depositary capacity, the United States keeps the original treaty texts and facilitates their signature, as appropriate. The depositary also receives instruments relating to the treaties, such as instruments of ratification, and maintains status lists of such actions.”[27]

[Note: some agreements listed by the State Department as “multilateral treaties” are certainly not; for example, the Kosovo UN Security Council Resolution is on the list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Interim_Administration_Mission_in_Kosovo]

[Note that all of the United Nations ‘treaties’ listed on the various State Department compilations noted above appear to be operational agreements for various international agencies, not Treaties governing relations among States.]

International conventions and agreements to form international associations, private clubs among nations, are not Treaties under Article VI of the US Constitution and as such are not binding on the Nation or its several States.

With the very recent Decision by the United States Supreme Court, Loper et al. vs Department of Commerce, overturning the traditional ‘deference’ shown by Courts to the interpretations of law by Federal Agencies, there is no special credence that we must give to the State Department’s interpretation of US treaty obligations.[28]

Continued participation in the UN and its subsidiary organizations, commitment of resources or public funding of same, on the basis of our alleged “treaty” obligations to them, is an unlawful act and must be immediately terminated.

1.4 The Act to appoint a UN Ambassador and provide for US participation.

The United Nations Precipitation Act of 1945 provided that the President shall appoint a Representative to the UN who shall have the "rank and status of Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary..." (see screen shot above). This appointment was a separate Act from any alleged Senate 'consent' to the UN Charter. The Representative "shall hold office at the pleasure of the President..." who therefore may remove the Representative or any "additional persons with appropriate titles..." appointed to participate.

1.5 The unilateral authority of the President to withdraw from the UN.

The US became a ‘member’ of the private membership club known as the United Nations by signature of the then President, unnecessarily ‘ratified’ by the US Senate.

Since the UN Charter is not a Treaty binding the United States as part of the Supreme Law of the Land, the President may, by unilateral act, withdraw from the UN. While the Constitution requires Senate consent to any Treaty, there is no constitutional provision regarding withdrawing from a ‘Treaty’ or any international agreement. Thus, such an act is solely within the executive competence of the President.

2.0 Conclusion.

The UN “Sustainable Development Goals” are a set of utopian (ie. fanciful and unrealistic) premises that they wish to impose on all nations, in order to steer the planet towards their twisted version of a better future. But, for whom will this future actually be “better”? At first read, each of the goals appears to be a very desirable and universal hope that people share. However, the devil is in the details, as always. These vague, seemingly benign statements are meant to lull the populace into a state of inattention and trust. Just in time for the Great Culling...

The Secretary of State and the UN Ambassador must conclude that the only way for the United States to protect its citizens from UN programs and agencies that are contrary to the interests of the United States, imposing globalist tyranny, is to withdraw from the UN immediately. #ExitUN

Respectfully submitted,
Ralph Fucetola JD
12 February 2025

With thanks for editing and research to the https://PreventGenocide2030.org collaborative.

[1] Agenda21.doc

[2] United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3-14 June 1992 | United Nations

[3] 2030_agenda_for_sustainable_development_kcsd_primer_en.pdf

[4] OHCHR | Universal Declaration of Human Rights - English

[5] Human rights is just a story - Noah Yuval Harari

[6] Exploring Biodigital Convergence - Policy Horizons Canada

[7] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12356

[8] U.S. Oversight of Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity: Current Policies, Recommended Reforms, and Options for Congress

[9] https://youtu.be/YrK8c3L3AKw

[10] https://youtu.be/OefI7KHWByI