Friday, July 31, 2009

Three Weeks to Save Food and Freedom

The House passed the draconian (sic) "food safety" bill yesterday. Congress is in recess but the Senate takes up the forced industrialization of food production in three weeks.

We have three weeks to save food... and freedom!

Please see:

This is an urgent freedom movement alert.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Swine Flu Vaccine "may be effective" NOT!

Media Release: One Million Demands for Right to Self-Shield:

Demand your Right to Self-Shield instead of submitting to the jab:

Last month the Secretary of "Health and Human Services" Kathleen Sebelius issued a declaration under the bioterrorism laws to provide "liability protections for pandemic countermeasures" including vaccines... well, OK, so what's new? Vaccine pushers have been exempt from liability since the early '80s.

The "declaration" it turns out bears rather closer scrutiny for what it also says, and doesn't say, about the vaccines themselves.

You can read the Secretary's bureaucratize at:

But what is said about the vaccines that are now to be given without liability for the harm they will do is both brief and instructive. The Secretary says: "Whereas, vaccination may be effective to protect persons from the threat of 2009 H1N1 influenza..."

Note the rhetoric; it uses the rubric "MAY" be effective... instead of the standard drug law statement that vaccines "are safe and effective." My colleague, Jim Turner Esq. of Swankin and Turner ( remarked to me, as we discussed this with Dr. Rima E. Laibow, "To be adjudged "safe and effective" a drug (including vaccine) must have benefits that outweigh the risks..."

So, Madame Secretary, are you telling us, by your very loud silence, that you don't know if the no-liability, uninsurable vaccine is safe? You are certainly telling us you don't know for sure that it is "effective!"

What is going on here with the Pandemic (Weaponized) Vaccine Panic? What is the govt's real agenda?

The last "swine flu" vaccine killed hundreds and no pandemic developed. Maybe people, in general, refusing the killer vaccine in '76 is the reason that flu never became pandemic.

The advanced healthcare theory is the vaccine itself "chooses" which strain of seasonal flu becomes epidemic and it was another experimental pandemic vaccine in 1918 that tiggered that pandemic disaster. Enough people who receive the vaccine always shed a concoction of viral particles that cause the spread of disease.

Rather than vaccines helping the situation, those who receive the vaccine become a present danger to public health! Certainly a threat to the unvaccinated majority.

Saying "NO!" to voluntary or mandated vaccination, it seems, is good for your health, and that of the community.

And holding vaccine makers and pushers liable for the foreseeable harm they cause is the opposite of what our misguided govt is doing...

Ralph Fucetola JD

PS - Think the govt doesn't lie? You need to read this extraordinary article on the mercury vaccine danger cover-up by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Here is a teaser: "“My gut feeling?” he said. “Forgive this personal comment — I do not want my grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on.” But instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine supply of thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data..."

PS#2 - Remember to demand your Right to Self-Shield instead of submitting to the jab:

Versions of this blog also posted at:

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Reactions to the Threat of Pandemic Vaccine Panic: Don’t Jab Us!

[This blog links from the National Solutions Foundation July 24, 2009 Health Freedom Action eAlert, posted at: ]

Media Release: One Millions Demands for Right to Self-Shield:

Reactions to the Threat of Pandemic Vaccine Panic:
Don’t Jab Us!

Sue for an injunction? Rely on your Sheriff to protect you? Complain to the FBI?

Everybody’s jumping on the band wagon… and that is a good thing! We’re facing an engineered pandemic to force an unproven, untested** and uninsurable “pandemic flu vaccine” on the public. As usual, Natural Solutions Foundation led the way, demanding that governments respect our fundamental human right to Self-Shield in our own homes in the event of a real pandemic, rather than be subjected to The Jab.

Now the “health freedom movement” is reacting, and many actions are being suggested.

Making sense out of the legal confusion.

Well meaning people are initiating steps to stop globalization of the planet and mandatory, weaponized vaccination. We applaud their efforts. Some of these efforts are brilliant, some of them may be somewhat effective and some are misguided.

Herewith a guide to their implications in the United States…

Complaint charging Baxter, WHO, Obama, UN, etc., with conspiracy to commit Crimes against Humanity, filed by investigative reporter Jane Burgermeister.

This outstanding effort has fired the imagination and informed millions of people, making it a worthy effort on that score. Jane Burgermeister is brilliant and we salute her effort. Since we are not experts on Austrian/EU law, we do not know the likelihood of this suit being accepted in the Austrian courts, or of the FBI responding to her well-reasoned, well-researched information linking the drug companies and the globalist population-reduction-by-any-means agenda.

Since the “accidental” contamination by Baxter of the Seasonal Flu vaccine intended for 18 European countries apparently took place in Austria, it is logical to file suit there. We have written to Ms. Bergermeister expressing our support for her efforts and urge you all to become familiar with them. Spain has a legal structure which holds that crimes against humanity any where on the planet are prosecutable in Spain. We hope that a similar suit is filed there.

Here is one of the many media reports on the action:

This suit, which will take a considerable time to process through the Court in Austria IF it is accepted for hearing, has little impact on US law, practice or vaccination policy. Unless and until the Globalists succeed in their plans for a One World Government, laws and judgments in sovereign countries have no impact on other sovereign countries although they might have trade implications, generally sorted out through trade dispute resolutions in the World Trade Organization if another agreement cannot be reached.

So Ms. Burgermeister’s suit is outstanding in Austria, important globally and will probably have no impact legally on the US, certainly not in time to meet the immediate threat.

Injunctions in the United States Delivered to Local Police and Law Enforcement to prevent mandatory vaccination: While it is enormously satisfying to take this action, it is fundamentally meaningless. All of the provisions necessary (e.g, Executive Orders, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services Directives, legislation and policy statements by CDC, FDA and WHO, State Emergency Medical Powers Acts, etc.,) are in place for the “pandemic emergency” leading to mandatory vaccination to be declared. The Natural Solutions Foundation fully expects that to happen, which is why we are urging you so strongly to take our Action Step to demand self quarantine in addition to the current choices you have if mandatory vaccination is declared. You know those choices: take the jab or be subjected to FEMA control… or force Congress to honor your Right* to Self-Shield:

Click here:

Despite the emotional satisfaction involved, however, it is highly unlikely that any court will issue an injunction against something that has not yet happened. The value of this effort is that perhaps, just perhaps, the people at the police station or prosecutor’s office where you deliver this document might read it and they might be less likely to enforce their orders for roundup, deportation, incarceration, vaccination or whatever.

We consider this a poor use of energy and time, and consider that the likelihood of changing the outcome of any order to vaccinate, detain or incarcerate people on the basis of some random people reading some documents - or not - that we cannot endorse this action, even for its educational value.

Universal Right to Refuse Vaccination Petition: The emotional and intellectual appeal of this internet activity is enormous. The political impact is zero. We have contacted the people involved in this activity to congratulate them on their activism and ask them to include the link to our Action Item for self shielding. We received no response. While it saddens us to say it, this intellectually worthy activity is educational to read but meaningless legally and in terms of any protection against vaccination. When the vaccinators are holding their syringe at your skin, explaining that if you refuse the vaccine, you will incarcerated, telling them that you signed the Universal Right to Refuse Vaccination Petition will not offer you protection. Therefore, we do not endorse this action because it provides no gain other than emotional solace in troubled times.

Sheriff Resistance: This legal approach holds that, as stated by the Supreme Court, there is no legal authority higher than a sitting sheriff in his own county. This is true and totally irrelevant. Although a sitting sheriff can refuse to comply with orders to vaccinate, detain, relocate or kill citizens and others, the likelihood of a full scale rebellion by a small force (Sheriffs and Deputy Sheriffs) against the United States Army and State or local Police whose authority and loyalty does not come from the traditional common law Sheriff structure, or worse yet, foreign and UN “Peacekeeping Forces” (including Chinese, Belgian, Eastern European and Canadian troops), National Guard and other non-sheriff forces seems absurd to us. Out numbered, out gunned, out commanded, any Sheriff who does oppose the mandate to vaccinate and/or incarcerate will simply wind up either overpowered and “relocated” or dead. This is, in our estimation, an invitation to armed insurrection consistent with an aggressive and non strategic thinking patterns without any likelihood of success. We cannot endorse this.

Armed Resistance: The Natural Solutions Foundation does NOT endorse, condone or support armed or violent resistance of any type for two reasons: first of all, we believe that there are better ways to fight injustice, oppression and fascism. Second, we know that the other side is better armed with weapons that can drop a resister at a mile and a half in a seizure without the resister even getting a telescopic sighting on the other side.

This is the wrong approach, guaranteeing death, incarceration or vaccination, or a combination of all of the above. Why give the other side what it wants?

For the record, with reference to the domestic terrorism law and other terrorism laws, regulations and executive orders, universally, the Foundation does not morally (or otherwise) support acts that are dangerous to human life, violate criminal law and “appear to be intended” to “intimidate or coerce a civilian population” or “influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion . . .”

We believe that push back, not revolution, is the answer to solving, not worsening, the situation.

Seemingly rational people say things like “I have my rifles and my guns - if they try to make me take a vaccine, they’ll have to take me down first”. They will, and they will do a good job of it, too.

How long can a militant hold out before the ammo runs out, the tear gas over comes him/her or the food and water run out? Or before the other side looses patience and he/she is the target of another Waco or Ruby Ridge?

If that is your preference, please understand that one such incident could serve as the “excuse” for martial law and worse.

The Natural Solutions Foundation urges you to take this moment seriously and act prudently:

1. Take the ACTION STEP

Click here:

2. Do whatever you can to motivate everyone you can reach to do the same and propagate this action. Our friends in Congress are considering introducing the self shielding legislation we have proposed to give us all that option. This is far more likely to happen if we can generate enormous support for it.

Read our White Paper: Stay Home; Stay Alive: Your Right to Self-Shield which has a link to the proposed bill and important information on preparations for Self-Shielding.

Click here:

3. Stock up on supplies for Self-Shielding. FEMA is advising its people, we have been told, to lay in a 30 day supply of water, food, vitamins, drugs, etc. If that is good enough for FEMA, it is good guidance for us.

4. See our evolving Online Vaccine Resources Portal: and please share this link with everyone.

The Foundation has two main focuses: (1) defending your Health Freedom and (2) discovering, developing, demonstrating and disseminating Natural Solutions to social problems. Even in defense of your rights, we are focused on Natural Solutions. This “pandemic panic” — artificially created as it is — is a clear and present danger to us all, but we will not allow it to prevent us from “keeping our eyes on the prize” — a better world, where all people are free to seek out natural ways and means to achieve and maintain a healthy self and healthy community.

Thank you for your continued support in this effort!


Yours, for Peace, Hope and Freedom…

Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Foundation Trustee and Counsel


*The Nuremberg Code forbids experimentation on people to which they do not agree through fully informed consent. The Helsinki Declaration says that people have strong rights to determine their own health course. The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights states that people have a right to health, clean food and environment. These documents, excellent as they are, have little legal weight in the United States. We find in these documents moral justification for our common law right to Self-Shield. To protect that right, we need Congress to acknowledge and recognize the right, and to give it “teeth” by forbidding federal funds to be used to involuntarily remove anyone from their own home while self-Shielding.

** Well, they are about to “test” it… NOT. How can you test the efficacy of a vaccine for a pandemic that doesn’t exist? The following article shows that we are the test subjects to see how many of us will be crippled or killed by this dangerous concoction. Even the Secretary of “Health and Human Services” has admitted that she is willing to sacrifice our young, saying that our children, pregnant women and the elderly will be among the first experimental subjects for a vaccine whose short and long term dangers cannot be known before it is used on them and that the government will (we quote her) “watch and see” to find out whether there are “too many” adverse events!

Associated Press - July 22, 2009 11:55 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) - The government is calling for several thousand volunteers to roll up their sleeves for the first swine flu shots, in a race to test whether a new vaccine really will protect against the virus before its expected to rebound in the fall.

The National Institutes of Health’s infectious disease chief, Dr. Anthony Fauci, tells The Associated Press that scientists first will test different doses of the swine flu vaccine in healthy adults and, if there are no immediate safety concerns, quickly begin testing babies and children.

The studies will begin at eight medical centers around the country - in Baltimore; Iowa City, Iowa; St. Louis; Nashville; Seattle; Atlanta; Cincinnati and Houston…

Monday, July 6, 2009

HR 2749 - (sic) "Food Safety" Bill

July 7, 2009 Emergency Health Freedom eBlast
from Natural Solutions Foundation:

Blog Entry:

While Self-Shielding in the face of manufactured pandemics and weaponized vaccines got our attention; while Codex further degraded the food supply... Congress was planning its own surprise: the forced-industrialization-of-farming bills, such as HR 875 & 759, have been replaced by a new "fast-tracked" (sic) "Food Safety" bill - HR 2749 - that threatens food, health and freedom. It is in reality, a "martial law food control bill" -- see:

I just checked with Dr. Ron Paul's office and am told that the bill is not likely to be voted on today, so there is still time to push-back. The good doctor's legislative aide told me that Congress is so focused on the bill to take-over health care costs that it is not likely that the "food safety" issue will come to the floor soon.

And, as you know, push-back works.

For example, we've been urging Congress to defeat all (sic) "Food Safety" bills, but also we set up an Action Item so about a hundred thousand people could tell them to protect family farms, home food production, food co-ops, etc.

See: No HARMonization White Paper:

Our original proposed amendment: *

And, apparently, they heard at least part of the message. Those who support HR 2749 are touting the (slight) "farmer protection" added to the bill to get it out of committee:

"Are Small Farms Protected?

"The legislation is doing a bunch of things for food safety, most notably
giving the FDA mandatory recall authority. This has been a major sticking
point for previous iterations of this legislation in the House, because House
reps more than senators represent small fiefdoms inside large rural states.
These districts worry recalls will disproportionately harm smaller businesses
and processors versus their larger partners. In a sense, FDA recalls and fees
would represent a regressive tax.

"This is an extremely valid concern given the FDA’s proclivity for influence
from industry. However, this bill was able to climb out of committee in the
House because it properly addressed small growers and farmers markets.
Specifically, Section 107 of the bill which stipulates ‘Traceability
Requirements’ on most farms makes an exemption for farmer’s markets (more
or less):


‘(A) DIRECT SALES BY FARMS- Food is exempt from the requirements of this
subsection if such food is–

‘(i) produced on a farm; and

‘(ii) sold by the owner, operator, or agent in charge of such farm
directly to a consumer or restaurant.

"Traceability is a huge issue and this bill seeks to establish a new electronic
system for tracking that will be vetted over the course of a couple years.
The exemption for small farmers is good but poorly defined. We hope this
vague language about exemptions gets tightened up as the bill moves forward.
It would be a pity to see this single exemption allow major agribusiness
farmers off the hook."

This is not the protection we want. But it is a start. We are concerned that the word "farm" could be construed too narrowly. What about religious communities, nonprofits, co-ops, community and family gardens that produce surpluses... Real protection is needed for local, natural production.

We need to redouble our efforts to get Congress to listen!

Here is the action item -

Remember to follow us on twitter: and - whenever we post a new blog, the link
appears on twitter!


* The language was modified later, and this later language was sent to
Congress many thousands of times:

"The citizens ascribing to this Petition therefore hereby request that the
Food Safety Modernization Act be defeated, or that it, or any substitute for
it, such as H.R. 759, be amended to exclude organic and natural agriculture,
family farms and ranches, and natural or organic food products, including
dietary supplements, through a rule of interpretation, as follows:

“Rule of Interpretation

“No provision of this act shall be deemed to apply (a) to any home,
home-business, homestead, small farm organic or natural agricultural activity,
(b) to any family farm or ranch, or (c) to any natural or organic food
product, including dietary supplements regulated under the Dietary Supplement
Health and Education Act of 1994.”

We also note the language of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 USC sec 203 (s)
(2) which provides, "(2) Any establishment that has as its only regular
employees the owner thereof or the parent, spouse, child, or other member of
the immediate family of such owner shall not be considered to be an enterprise
engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce or a part of
such an enterprise..." Language such as this would be helpful to allay our


Versions of this blog also published at:

Campaign for Liberty blog blog

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Gen. Stubblebine on Freedom for Independence Day

Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army Ret.) is a tireless campaigner for liberty and a great supporter of pro-freedom activism. He is President of the Natural Solutions Foundation, largest voice of health freedom in the world -

Interview Posted with Gen. Bert

Freedom is indivisible, so it is appropriate on this Independence Day Weekend that an interview with Gen. Stubblebine from earlier this year has been published on YouTube. See him discuss the tragedy of 9/11 with cogent passion:

And while we are at it, here is Gen. Bert on the Oath-Keepers blogspot:

"My oath is sacred in my heart and will remain so. I will remain loyal to the Constitution of These United States to protect it from all enemies foreign and domestic, no matter what office or robe they wear."

With honorable patriots like Gen. Stubblebine to inspire us, there is still something worth celebrating on the Fourth of July!

Ralph Fucetola JD
NSF Trustee

Here is a link to our Health Freedom Action eAlert from earlier today, with links to reports from the 32nd Codex Alimentarius Commission Meeting, which Gen. Bert attended, representing Health Freedom - since "Health Freedom is Our First Freedom."

"You won't believe what happened at Codex"

And finally, here is a link to me delivering a Message from Gen. Stubblebine to the End the Fed Rally, last November in Manhattan: