Thursday, January 8, 2009

Defending Nano Silver

In the Defense of Nano Silver: Comments to EPA Needed

Health Freedom Action eAlert - take action here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26405

More information: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=1773

UPDATE
Comment due date extended to March 20, 2009!


Those “internationalists” who want to see humanity culled by the "inevitable" pandemic about which we at Natural Solutions Foundation have raised the alarm these past months cannot succeed so long as a general immune system support nutrient exists around which dangerous pathogens cannot mutate. So long as we have a nutritional defense to the pandemic UN and other authorities tell us will happen “soon,” we now doubt it will actually take place as quickly as forecast.

That protective nutrient is nano silver, in the presence of which none of the naturally deadly or even weaponized pathogens can survive. So it was to be expected that major attacks on silver would predate the actual start of the pandemic. Years ago the Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, forbade any health claims about silver (through our Health Freedom Action eAlerts we have, however, made millions of people aware of the protective benefits of silver). And now the Environmental “Protection” Agency, the EPA, weighs in with potentially devastating regulations of topical uses (see docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0650).

Yes, that "final" attack has started and if successful -- if nutrient and topical silver are removed from the market -- you can be sure the pandemic will soon follow.

Natural Solutions Foundation has determined to make the defense of nano silver a major effort this year. I have volunteered to focus on protecting access to silver as Coordinator of our new Defense of Nano Silver program. Now that silver has been shown to be safe (even massive over-use only causes, in two recorded cases, a benign skin discoloration), silver must be protected from political attack to remain available to the public, ultimately, to prevent the pandemic only the most cynical New World Order depopulation fanatic would ever want to see happen.

We believe our efforts focused on educating decision makers and the public about the nature of the false attacks on silver and the benefits of silver in the current heightened threat environment will go a long way toward protecting the public from a potentially devastating world pandemic. We urge all silver purveyors to become company sponsors of Natural Solutions Foundation to support these efforts. Please email me if your company is ready to “step up to the plate.”

The current efforts to protect nano silver are clearly insufficient to withstand current and likely future attacks. Therefore, I have resigned from the Silver Safety Committee, on which I have served for 8 years, to free up more time for direct action to protect silver and with it, Health Freedom, as part of the Natural Solutions Foundation's International Decade of Nutrition.

The trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation feel strongly that nano silver is a perfect test case for our Health Freedom: with it, weaponized or naturally pandemic threats are reduced through safe, natural home remedies; silver solutions have been used for centuries by knowledgeable individuals. At the same time, pharmaceutical and medical control and profits are reduced. Without it, we are at the mercy of the weaponizers and of the profiteering habits of Big Pharma.

Nano silver is, in a very real sense, intimately connected with our collective and individual health, freedom, and perhaps, survival.

We ask everyone to join us in telling the EPA to leave nano silver alone. This is yet another case where unnecessary government regulation is being forced on us, with “unintentional” dangerous results.

Here is the link to the EPA “petition” – www .epa .gov/EPA-PEST/2008/November/Day-19/p27204.htm

Here is the link to our Action Item so you can make your voice heard by the EPA:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26405

Here are the comments the Foundation submitted to EPA today:

http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=SubmitComment&o=09000064807b157b
Docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0650
Long Title EPA Response to ICTA Petition on Nanotechnology

Document Information
Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0650-0001
Document Title: Petition for Rulemaking Requesting EPA Regulate Nanoscale Silver Products as Pesticides

Submitter Information
Organization Name: Natural Solutions Foundation
Submitter's Representative: Ralph Fucetola JD
Comment Tracking Number: 80813e49

Comments

The Natural Solutions Foundation, founded in 2004, is an international NGO (Non Governmental Organization) focused on health freedom. We are active and registered in several countries and a not for profit 501(C )(3) tax exempt organization in the United States. The Mission of the Foundation is to discover, develop, demonstrate and disseminate natural solutions to the problems facing us and threatening our health and freedom, achieving and maintaining a healthy self, community and world. Our primary web site is www.HealthFreedomUSA.org. We have over 190,000 people on our opt-in Health Freedom Action eAlert system.

We have reviewed the "petition" seeking to have EPA "regulate" topical use of nano silver as a "pesticide." The regulations sought are unnecessary and harmful to the public good.

Silver products have traditionally been used for their cleansing benefits. Even the old idea of "being born with a silver spoon in your mouth" is testament to the traditional protective benefits of silver. Silver utensils are one example of silver use that dates back thousands of years. The modern application of silver to counter tops, food containers and the like is merely a continuation of that traditional, natural use.

We see no convincing evidence that there is any potential of imminent harm to the public from the continued use of silver, topically or otherwise. Therefore there is no rational basis upon which to regulate silver as a "pesticide."

We request that the EPA deny the "petition."

------------------------
Revised Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0650-0506
Revised direct comment page (for extended 03/20/09 deadline)
http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=SubmitComment&o=090000648081edc9

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I just left my comment and it aligns with this blog nicely! I have been using Colloidal Silver for over 15 years now and I do not even get the colds that people sneeze on me! Every time my children and family forgets to take their "silver"weeks on end, they come down with a weird virus. Not me. SO the "silver spoons" should be bought and kept for an emergency. If any Gov is that stupid to mess up the lives of themselves-we are the body that makes up the governments-God help us! I appreciate all that you are doing to help preserve our "Birth Rights" to Good Health! BTW Health is suppose to mean good health right? Now we have to clarify that!

Thank you again for all that you do!

Charlie Wildish said...

It disgusts me the way that self interest groups try to take away our choice through these backdoor methods, not to mention peoples livelyhoods. So much for "freedom and democracy" and the right to choice.

I use and sell colloidal silver and I am very satisfied with the results. My colloidal silver is made by American Biotech Labs and marketed by Nutronics. It is one of the main named targeted brands. It does however already have some EPA toxicity clearences (click on my name).

Can you advise if these clearences would be enough to get it through these new ridiculous regulation?

Thank you.

Cindy Findley said...

There will be a 4-day consultation meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) to consider and review a set of scientific issues related to the assessment of hazard and exposure associated with nanosilver and other nanometal pesticide products.

DATES: The consultation meeting will be held on November 3 - 6, 2009, from approximately 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The consultation meeting will be held at the Environmental Protection Agency, Conference Center, Lobby Level, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202.
Comments. The Agency encourages that written comments be submitted by October 20, 2009 and requests for oral comments be submitted by October 27, 2009. Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0683, by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph E. Bailey, DFO, Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-2045; fax number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail address: bailey.joseph@epa.gov.

Source: http://www.FederalRegister.com