Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Who is Telling the Truth about COVID-19?

COVID-19: Who’s Telling You the Truth
And Who’s Not?
Misinformation… Disinformation…

Correcting COVID-19 Misinformation
Truth About Coronavirus Web Site
www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com


Is there anything we can believe about Mass Media reporting about the Chinese Coronavirus — COVID-19?  We suspect not. 
Some of the misinformation is fairly innocuous, such as the Fox News report about cats in China wearing sanitary face masks. [1]  Some reports suggest that the novel virus, with a 3% kill rate and great virulence, developed at an “exotic” meat market in Wuhan China.  Others accuse the accidental — or maybe intentional — release of a weaponized virus from a Red Army research facility in the same city.  This seems linked to coronavirus experiments being conducted, in part, by Chinese nationals at a Canadian laboratory.
We are following these developments and have documented recent data points at   www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com.

We are not particularly following the alleged numerical spread of the virus since the figures released by the Chinese Government do not seem accurate.  A cover-up appears to have been in place since late last year, before the Western Media first began to report.  If you want to see graphs about the number of cases and deaths, these are readily available online.
What we are covering are the hard facts of causation and the urgent facts of protection and response.
We note that the World Health Organization, WHO, during the 2014 Ebola outbreak issued a statement that, during a pandemic, it is ethical to try even unverified interventions that may offer potential benefit. [2]

In that spirit,  www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com provides links to approaches that may or may not help.  For example, sanitary face masks, whether worn by cats or people, are critically discussed.  [3]
While Truth About Coronavirus may be hard to discern in the Media of Mass Deception, the sources we rely upon at  www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com  have shown themselves to be, in our view, more truthful than the misinformation and disinformation being peddled over the Mass Media.
You are urged to share the   www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com link with everyone.

And let us know what you’ve discovered about the misinformation and disinformation that you are finding.  We rely on an aware public to express the Truth About Coronavirus.
Join Dr. Rima’s powerful new email list to be assured that you will remain in the loop. And urge all your circles of influence to do the same. 
Knowledge is protection.  Connection is knowledge. 
———-
“In the particular circumstances of this outbreak, and provided certain conditions are met, the panel reached consensus that it is ethical to offer unproven interventions with as yet unknown efficacy and adverse effects, as potential treatment or prevention. Ethical criteria must guide the provision of such interventions. These include transparency about all aspects of care, informed consent, freedom of choice, confidentiality, respect for the person, preservation of dignity and involvement of the community.” [Emphasis added.]








Monday, February 3, 2020

Patricia Finn - The Good Health Lawyer
Obtains Vaccine TRO

Medically Fragile NY Child Back In School
With No Vaccines
Thanks to Attorney Patricia Finn, Esq.
Rockland County, New York:  Counsel Patricia Finn, The Good Health Lawyer [1] has saved a medically fragile child from what his pediatrician says is “certain damage” following vaccination, by arguing successfully in the New York Supreme Court that New York State does not have the power to substitute a bureaucrat’s decision for a patient’s physician.
Arguing that a physician, as a “learned intermediary,” has the right to issue a medical exemption for a patient and the State has the obligation to honor that exemption, Counsel Finn has scored a major health freedom victory for the moment.
Several well-known and well-funded law firms have not been able to achieve what Counsel Finn succeeded in establishing in this case.
This victory is the first to validate the important principle of the physician as “Learned Intermediary” and to achieve a Temporary Restraining Order overturning the State’s attempt to force vaccination on this child.
In both California and New York, the largest forced-vaccine states, vaccine freedom of choice has been attacked in two ways.  First, the state legislatures have abolished long-standing religious and/or conscientious exemptions and second, the bureaucracies in both states have made obtaining a formal Medical Excuse virtually impossible.  New York’s legislature and governor pushed the new vaccine exemption restrictions into law at the end of the 2019 legislative session in one day, without public hearings.
It is believed they have intentionally tried to make it so difficult that they have undercut the protected relationship between doctor and patient. This violates the universal right of Informed Consent by preventing physicians, as Learned Intermediaries, from uttering their true opinions regarding the safety of vaccines for their patients.
The child in this case was certified vaccine-fragile since his doctor said he could expect serious adverse reactions to further vaccination.  It is important to note that the child’s doctor believes in vaccination for the general populace, and vaccinates his own children,  yet, exercising his best medical judgment, affirmed that this child should not be vaccinated.  Under New York’s new rule the physician’s learned opinion was disregarded and the school system, despite the damage that was likely to result for the child, rejected the exemption.  In other words, the state wanted a school bureaucrat to overturn the physician’s protection of his patient.
This flies in the face of settled United States law. For over a century US courts have held they have the power to intervene against forced vaccination “…if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that he is not at the time a fit subject of vaccination or that vaccination, by reason of his then condition, would seriously impair his health or probably cause his death.” Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
Counsel Finn’s successful effort to protect this child with a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) assures this child access to the free public education guaranteed to him by the laws of New York, without surrendering his right to protection from what US and international courts have repeatedly called “unavoidably unsafe” vaccines.
The attempts by States like New York and California to illegally force parents to choose between their objections to vaccination — their universal right of Informed Consent — or the public education guaranteed to their children is an imposition of what the Federal Courts call an “unconstitutional condition.” No state has power to condition a public benefit on the surrender of a right.
In this case New York is learning that important lesson thanks to Counsel Finn and the determined parents willing to protect their child.
All of us have the right of Informed Consent, if and only if we assert it properly. If you do not assert that right it will be “deemed waived.”
Counsel Finn has announced plans to institute additional litigation to further test the legal validity of New York’s new vaccine exemption restrictions.
-----
Further Information:
To learn more about how to assert that right for yourself and your loved ones, click here: https://tinyurl.com/AVDcard.
Links to Counsel Finn’s web sites:



Sunday, February 2, 2020

Coronavirus and Bioweapons

The Plot Thickens:
Who Weaponized the Chinese Coronavirus?
Update:  New Link to Coronavirus Aggregation Page
www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com
As I was driving about today, doing my Saturday chores, the car radio news and my cell phone were both buzzing about the Coronavirus outbreak in China. Over a couple hours the claimed death toll rose from 259 to 296 while the known infected rose to over twelve thousand, involving all parts of China and dozens of other countries, including the USA.
While the death toll climbed the World Wide Web Thought Control System went into hyper-drive. For example, libertarian economics news aggregation site Zero Hedge was banned from Twitter for tweeting the name and location of a Chinese scientist who was allegedly involved in manipulation of the Coronavirus genome. [1]
In an earlier OST piece I discussed the 2007 patent regarding coronaviruses and vaccines. [2]. Yes, the US government owns that patent.
While that fact data point is instructive, suggesting US involvement somehow connected to Chinese scientists (and thus to the Chinese authorities). One rumor even has it that the coronavirus outbreak, primarily centered in the central China city of Wuhan, is a false flag feint — meant to take attention away from another threat to the health of Wuhan citizens. Wuhan, so goes the story, is the first Chinese city to be fully 5G (an advanced wireless system held to be a risky technology by its critics).
Let’s take a look at some more odd data points from the Internet frenzy of the past few days. It was Natural Solutions Foundation’s Founding President, Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine who always told us to aggregate the data points and remain open-minded to what the data shows.
Item: “Coronavirus Contains HIV Insertions Stoking Fears Over Artificially Created Bioweapon [3] — “The theory is that China obtained the coronavirus via a Canadian research program, and started molding it into a bioweapon at the Institute of Virology in Wuhan. Politifact pointed the finger at Zero Hedge…”
Item: “New Coronavirus in China Is Treated With HIV Meds” [4] — “Health officials in China are including two HIV meds as treatment for pneumonia caused by the new coronavirus, reports Bloomberg News. Specifically, the country’s National Health Commission in Beijing recommends the HIV drug Kaletra, which is manufactured by AbbVie and is also marketed as Aluvia.”
We have been warned for decades that it is inevitable that humanity will suffer a global pandemic far worse than the Influenza Pandemic that started at the end of World War One and killed more people than the War had — between 50 and a hundred million. [5]
Looking into the epidemic history of the past several millennia in Eurasia, it appears that a world plague has struck on average every half millennium. Seven hundred years ago it was the Bubonic Plague that started in 1346 CE and may have killed a third of the population of Europe. Before that, the Plague of Justinian killed 40% of Eurasia’s population in 541 CE and before that, the Antonine Plague killed 30% of Eurasia around 165 CE. Is this about to happen again? Is it just a natural outcome of the history of our species or is it something more sinister?
Is the Chinese Coronavirus, able to spread quickly through casual human contact, before symptoms are apparent, destined to spread across the world — Literally flown from city to city by modern transportation?
Do the data points suggest that there are two stages of infection: an acute stage that has a 2 or 3% death rate and is very easily transmitted, and a chronic version more like HIV infection with a much higher, but long-term, death rate?
Is the Chinese Coronavirus a weaponized virus?  Who weaponized it? WHO? We may know over the next few weeks.
As we await history’s verdict, however, this comment from Rima Laibow, MD, is to be considered:
“SARS and MERS are also coronaviruses. My understanding that such viruses are easy to weaponize. General Bert warned us years ago about the weaponization of influenza-like viruses to further the globalist depopulation agenda. This is occurring as the World Health Organization prepares to declare a World Health Emergency which would give WHO near total control of the planet. This is, of course, unnecessary, since the powerful support that Nano Silver 10 PPM provides for your immune system operates in the presence of coronavirus.” Rima Laibow, MD [6]
——–
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-01/zero-hedge-permanently-suspended-from-twitter-for-harassment
[2] http://www.opensourcetruth.com/deadly-coronavirus-from-china-or-is-it-from-the-cdc/
[3] https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/763929-coronavirus-contains-hiv-insertions-stoking-fears-over-artificially-created-bioweapon?utm_source=c-am&utm_medium=c-am-email&utm_term=c-am-Gmail&utm_content=2NP8dQ3y-
[4] https://www.poz.com/article/china-uses-hiv-meds-treat-new-coronaviruspxXLrBjgnFLsE5Mb9VNUkg..A
[5] http://www.opensourcetruth.com/one-hundred-years-later-lessons-not-learned/
[6] http://www.opensourcetruth.com/another-weaponized-virus/

Tuesday, January 28, 2020

Deadly Coronavirus from China or CDC?

Update:  New Link to Coronavirus Aggregation Page
www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com
Deadly Coronavirus from China... or is it from the CDC?

While the news is filled with dire warnings about the Coronavirus outbreak in China which has resulted in scaling-back the Chinese New Year celebration and the total quarantining of at least one major city, the question remains:  how does this new outbreak relate to existing coronaviruses, namely SARS and MEARS?

Did this new version really start in China, or, as some have stated, is it a "weaponized" virus unleashed upon the world?

Let's start with the Patent. Yes there is a Coronavirus Patent. [1]  The US government owns it.  It was issued to the CDC in 2007.

Here is some of what it says:

"Disclosed herein is a newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Also provided are the nucleic acid sequence of the SARS-CoV genome and the amino acid sequences of the SARS-CoV open reading frames, as well as methods of using these molecules to detect a SARS-CoV and detect infections therewith. Immune stimulatory compositions are also provided, along with methods of their use... Without wishing to be bound by a specific theory, it is believed that an immunogenic response may arise from the generation of an antibody specific to one or more of the epitopes provided in the immune stimulatory composition. Alternatively, the response may comprise a T-helper or cytotoxic cell-based response to one or more of the epitopes provided in the immune stimulatory composition. All three of these responses may originate from naïve or memory cells. One specific example of a type of immune stimulatory composition is a vaccine."

Some researchers see a deep connection between this new CoV viral expression and the potential for weaponization.  For example, Sharry Edwards, MEd, has analysized the China CoV and found markers that suggest weaponization. The frequencies related to the new CoV are too "regular" and suggest something other than a natural source of mutation.

"Director of Institute of BioAcoustic Biology, Sharry Edwards.. share[s] the Institute's analysis of the Coronavirus currently sweeping through China... She explains how her research shows that this latest virus and many of the flu strands have characteristics pointing to a bioweapon versus a natural phenomena..." [2]

The CDC's approach is "stimulating the immune system" (sic) through vaccines.  Ms. Edwards discusses the relationship between cell membranes and viral penetration, suggesting energetic and nutritional approaches. She views the frequencies associated with the CoV and finds that they are not what one might expect from a virus developing naturally.

Here is what Rima Laibow, MD tells us about stimulating the immune system to keep the natural microbiome in balance:  "The best way to protect yourself from potentially pandemic viruses, whether occurring naturally or weaponized, is to support your natural immunity to viral replication.  If a virus cannot penetrate cell membranes, it cannot replicate and cause symptoms.  The best way I know to support natural cell membrane integrity is to supplement with Nano Silver 10 PPM.  In a US government-sponsored study declassified in 2009 it was shown that, in living human cell samples, various viruses did not penetrate the cell membraines the presence of Nano Silver 10 PPM." [3]

Natural virus? Weaponized virus? USA Patents?  Do your own research and pay attention to this latest outbreak. 

It's all about YOUR immune system! [4]


---------------------
[1]  https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852

[2]  https://sarahwestall.com/coronavirus-analysis-points-to-bioweapon-bioacoustic-solutions-exist-w-sharry-edwards/

[3]  http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/DTRA.Infographic-2019-768x655.jpg

[4] http://drrimatruthreports.com/lets-all-panic-and-get-our-flu-shots-not/