Wednesday, August 20, 2014

It's Time for Natural Health to Take Back the "C" Word - Nature Cures.

http://globalhealthfreedom.org

Natural Means Cure

Congress mandated, in the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA), that all bottles of vitamins and other dietary supplements include the following disclaimer:
"These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.  This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease."
In recent days, with the "Ebola Outbreak" breaking out into an "epidemic" and perhaps soon, a "pandemic" the words "treat, cure or prevent..." have been bandied about in the blogisphere and on the mass media. People are rightfully concerned about this increasingly virulent disease.

We at Natural Solutions Foundation have been accused in some quarters of verging on promoting "bogus cures" for the hemorrhagic viral diseases due to Dr. Rima's forthright championing of the virtues of Nano Silver to those who would voluntarily follow her advice. [1] Even that most establishment of all media, the NY Times, castigated Dr. Rima and has refused to retract factually erroneous statements.[2]

So what if we claim that "Natural means can cure disease."? Why should that statement not have the same speech protection that any other expressive association statement that Dr. Rima might make? Such as, "Vaccines contain dangerous toxins and can trigger autism or infertility." Why is the first statement about a "bogus cure" while the second is just an opinion?

Is it because in the first, Dr. Rima has the means to effect change, namely, the very Nano Silver that was tested through the Defense Threat Research Agency in vitro against Ebola.[3] Does Dr. Rima's name and recommendation on The Silver Solution label render her subject to prior censorship by the FDA under authority from Congress? In the second example above, there is no Dr. Rima Recommends product. Does that make any difference? I don't read the First Amendment to make any exceptions for the injunction that "Congress shall make no law...

What authority does Congress have to mandate certain speech about voluntarily chosen health choices? Does that authority change when Congress is concerned about a "dangerous" (at least when inhaled) substance such as tobacco? Or a supposedly "harmful" substance such as hemp?

Although the courts have tried to parse a convoluted line between "permitted" speech and something else ("un-permitted speech"? "commercial speech"? "obscene speech"?...) they have never found any qualifying language in the First Amendment that might make "no law" mean something else.

Thus in my humble opinion, Congress has no authority to mandate or censor speech.

The Supreme Court may be moving in that direction. Consider the 2002 case of Thompson vs Western States. There the issue was whether Congress could censor what Compounding Pharmacists said about their products. Here is what the Court said:
"If the First Amendment means anything, it means that regulating speech must be a last - not first - resort."
"We have previously rejected the notion that the Government has an interest in preventing the dissemination of truthful commercial information in order to prevent members of the public from making bad decisions with the information."
"Even if the Government did argue that it had an interest in preventing misleading advertisements, this interest could be satisfied by the far less restrictive alternative of requiring each compounded drug to be labeled with a warning that the drug had not undergone FDA testing and that its risks were unknown."
In 1995 I handled the DHEA cases [4], when two Life Extension Foundation members were accused of importing a supposed "controlled substance" when they bought DHEA from Europe. In the case that completed the litigation over the issue the Judge issued an order that DHEA, which is indigenous to the human body, was not a controlled substance. Thus we can conclude that nutrients like silver or cannabidiol, which occur naturally in the body, are not subject to police power restrictions.

If an educated professional like Dr. Rima chooses to assert that Nano Silver "cures" Ebola, it is not within the power of Congress to forbid her speech. It just so happens that we've been careful to avoid medical-legal "terms of art" (like "treat" and "cure") that might cause discontent among the public health authorities. But even our careful use of language, by referring not to "treating" but rather to "therapies" [5] that may benefit seems to be interpreted by some as offering  "bogus cures."

Maybe, therefore, it is time to reassert the right of every individual to speak their own truth about health. It's time to "take back" the word "cure."

Pharmaceutical drugs do not "cure." They poison enzyme systems to suppress disease symptoms. Natural means, to the contrary, support the body's native ability to defend against invasion. If a person is in good health and has proper nourishment and rest, absent toxins, stress and other deleterious circumstances, we generally can overcome health challenges.

That is why a representative group of Health Freedom Advocates met in 2000 to state, in the Wilton Declaration (and expanded in subsequent Declarations): 
The time has come for healers and those they seek to help to... Assert our right to heal and be healed... We declare our independence from bureaucratic restrictions on our fundamental human rights ... To defend these basic human rights and the healers, physicians and other practitioners alike, who we freely choose to help us achieve and maintain health. . ." [6]
The time has more than come... with what General Bert Stubblebine has called the "perfect storm" [7] of toxic assaults on our health, of which the emerging viral diseases may be a result, our lives and the future of our species on this world depend on it.

----------------


Monday, August 18, 2014

Natural Solutions Replies to NY Times Calumny

.
To The Editor
New York Times
letters@nytimes.com
.
Ref: August 16, 2014, on page A6 of the New York edition with the headline: Agencies Issue Warnings Over Bogus Ebola Cures.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/16/science/agencies-issue-warnings-over-bogus-ebola-cures.html?_r=0
————————————
.
To the Editor:
.
I am a Trustee of the Natural Solutions Foundation along with its founders, Rima E. Laibow, MD and Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine III (US Army Ret.). We are responding to your August 16, 2014 article, “Agencies Issue Warnings Over Bogus Ebola Cures” (page A6) which mentions our Foundation and provides several incorrect data points and implications.
.
It is not true that we provided Nigeria with Nano Silver.  This erroneous statement in the New York Times should be publicly retracted. In fact, we have made the point, in writing, several times, that we know nothing about this doctor, his supposed silver, its research base (if any), its composition, concentration, purity or particle size, all of which are critical to the action of a nutrient nano-solution like Nano Silver.
.
We have also made the point in writing, video and podcasts numerous times that we are in close contact with the manufacturer of the same Nano Silver 10 PPM which was tested in vitro against the Ebola virus and found to be highly effective in inactivating Ebola virus in the research declassified by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency of the US Department of Defense in 2009. That company confirms that no one secured enough Nano Silver from them to match the shipment allegedly brought to Nigeria, so that there was no likely possibility that it could be the same Nano Silver 10 PPM of which we had spoken and written.
.
Your article further states that Dr. Rima was unavailable for comment and that questions emailed to her were not answered.  She has no record of any correspondence from the New York Times or anyone writing on their behalf so that your assertion that she did not respond to your questions is correct since she never received them, nor did she receive any phone calls.  Her 3 VOIP phone numbers, 3 cell phone numbers and one land line numbers uniformly show no record of any attempted or missed calls from North America.  Thus, she was not able to respond to your calls for the same reason: she did not receive them. Dr. Rima has made herself available for dozens of interviews over the past few days.
.
Natural Solutions Foundation was established in 2004 with a specific Mission: To Discover, Develop, Demonstrate, Document and Disseminate natural solutions to pressing social issues. Since that time we have grown to become the premiere global health freedom association, www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org.
.
Rima E. Laibow, MD, our Medical Director, is a world-renowned physician practicing environmental and natural medicine and psychiatry. She has practiced drug-free medicine for over 44 years, primarily in New York State where she has been licensed from 1971.  She holds inactive licenses in two other States.
.
In 2007 she addressed a meeting of 47 African Ministers of Health in Mombasa, Kenya at the invitation of the President of the organization of Ministers of Health.  In her address, she warned the Ministers and their staff members about emerging viral diseases and urging adoption of natural means to respond to such diseases, citing such measures Intravenous Vitamin C and nutrient Nano Silver 10 PPM as primary natural remedies.
.
The President of the Foundation, known as “General Bert”, was the Commanding General  of US Army Intelligence and Security Command when he retired from the Army.  He has, since his retirement from the Army, become the chief strategist for global health freedom efforts. I practiced law for 36 years in the NY metro area, specializing in dietary supplement regulatory issues.
.
While the FDA and CDC are technically correct that “there is no approved treatment for Ebola…” that often repeated mantra is deceptive and misleading. FDA has legal authority which includes approval or denial of approval ONLY for pharmaceutical drugs that are presented by the industry. It is critically important to this issue to understand that, under the Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) this agency HAS NO AUTHORITY TO EITHER APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE DSHEA-grandfathered nutrient substances such as Nano Silver when they are offered to support the normal structure and function of the body.  We have always been careful in that regard; when Dr. Rima Recommends Nano Silver, or any other natural solution, the recommendation is solely as a nutrient therapy that may benefit, as permitted under FDA guidelines and regulations.
.
In 2009 the United States Government declassified the DTRA (Defense Threat Research Agency) Nano Silver Ebola Study. The study was cleared for release via authorization 88ABW-2009-4491 and funded by DTRA through proposal #4.10036_07_AHB_B and JSTO/DTRA-NRC.  The study was verified through the Public Relations office of DTRA under an informal Freedom of Information request recently filed by the Natural Solutions Foundation.
.
That study, conducted in vitro with active hemorrhagic viruses including Ebola, definitively showed that Nano Silver 10 PPM inhibits viral reproduction by supporting normal cell membrane structure and function, thereby stopping the virus before it can adhere to the cell, penetrate it or reproduce.
.
There is nothing speculative about this research: the results are quite definitive.
.
This is not a Drug Effect (prescription drugs work by poisoning enzyme systems to suppress symptoms). Nano Silver does not act like a drug; rather it is a nutrient that nourishes normal response to viral invaders.
.
The biological immune support functions of this nutrient are well-known and characterized by a massive scientific literature.
.
Nano Silver has been approved by the EPA as a not-toxic surface sanitizer for hospital, food service and other industrial environments, and as such, can have a vital role in stopping Ebola.
.
But Nano Silver is also a nutrient and may be used for immune system support, and as such, will save lives and may contain the disease.
.
Now, during this humanitarian crisis, WHO tells us it is ethical to try “unapproved interventions.” Humanitarian considerations must trump the niceties of regulatory law. Our Foundation, exercising our inalienable expressive association rights, has donated a small supply of Nano Silver 10 PPM and silver gel to one of the “Ebola front line states” , and made a larger quantity available to another one of the front line states at the request of the their government.  Those states do not include Nigeria although Dr. Rima has made serious efforts to get the correct Nano Silver 10 PPM to the government of that country, without success.
.
That Nano Silver 10 PPM which has been provided is identical to that used in the above referenced study. It is being provided in cooperation with people from those countries both in their home nations and in the United States, as well as with the public health authorities there, for the purpose of an emergency clinical test of Nano Silver in vivo. It is our expectation that Nano Silver can be an important tool in containing the Ebola Outbreak which is now breaking-out, threatening a world-wide pandemic.
.
Mapp Biopharmaceuticals has received at least $140 million dollars for the development of its experimental, untested, unproven drug.  A Canadian vaccine maker is being paid handsomely for its experimental, untested and unproven vaccine.  Neither has an established scientific and clinical record of safety while inexpensive, safe, non-toxic Nano Silver 10 PPM is under what can only be called vicious attack.
.
At the same time that the New York Times incorrectly and inaccurately castigates both Nano Silver and the Natural Solutions Foundation, it suggests the use of Statin drugs against Ebola, as wild, wooly and bizarre a speculation as any snake oil salesman ever concocted.
.
The double standard is shocking and disappointing since the New York Times holds itself to a higher standard than supermarket checkout tabloids, or maintains that it does.
.
It is time for the conflict of interest-ridden FDA and CDC, whose track records in objective public safety are shamefully lacking, to finally stop misinforming the public about the potential therapeutic benefits of Nano Silver 10 PPM and stop actively obstructing the natural solutions to this humanitarian emergency.

Sincerely,
.
Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Trustee and Counsel
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

WHO Confirms: It Is Ethical to Use "Unapproved Interventions" in Ebola Outbreak

Memorandum

Date: August 12, 2014
.
From:
 Ralph Fucetola JD. Natural Solutions Foundation Counsel
.
To: Rima E. Laibow MD, Natural Solutions Foundation Medical Director”
.
Re: Legal Status of the Foundation’s Ebola Nano Silver Initiative

.
Legal Question Presented: What is the current legal status of recommending Nano Silver as an intervention during the current Ebola Outbreak?
.
Legal Principles: International and national law set out regulations regarding the standard practice of medicine. In most countries, physicians are restricted by their licenses to the practice of standard medicine. Physicians can rely on the standards of practice in ordinary circumstances. Similarly, regulations have been developed regarding medical experimentation on individuals. However, during a humanitarian emergency, other concerns become more pressing.
.
The World Health Organization (WHO), which has declared an international health emergency today, repeated these international principles in a declaration regarding Ebola and “unapproved interventions…”*
In the particular circumstances of this outbreak, and provided certain conditions are met, the panel reached consensus that it is ethical to offer unproven interventions with as yet unknown efficacy and adverse effects, as potential treatment or prevention. [Emphasis added.]
Ethical criteria must guide the provision of such interventions. These include transparency about all aspects of care, informed consent, freedom of choice, confidentiality, respect for the person, preservation of dignity and involvement of the community.
Analysis: Nano Silver provides a therapy that may benefit and should be readily available without restriction.
.
Natural Solutions Foundation supports the international standards enunciated by the World Medical Association in its Helsinki Declaration.** The basic principles involve informed consent and doing no intentional harm. US Federal law has similar restrictions on human experimentation.
.
The WMA declaration states:
It is the duty of physicians who are involved in medical research to protect the life, health, dignity, integrity, right to self-determination, privacy, and confidentiality of personal information of research subjects.
These restrictions must be considered in light of the current Ebola Outbreak and with regard to the 2009 declassification of the  US Air Force sponsored in vitro Ebola / Nano Silver study that proved the effectiveness of Nano Silver as a virus replication inactivator: http://drrimatruthreports.com/smoking-gun-us-suppressing-ebola-therapy-since-2009/
.
I have reviewed the Dr. Rima Nano Silver Ebola Clinical Test Protocol. This document, provided to the Ebola “front line” states, shows that the test proposal meets these international standards. Several West African states have indicated in writing their willingness to allow Clinical Tests with patients suffering from Ebola, pursuant to the Protocol. A copy of the Protocol may be obtained here: http://tinyurl.com/ebolaprotocol
.
The purpose of this Memorandum is to assure the cooperating physicians and the public health authorities of West Africa that, in addition to the United States FDA approval of Nano Silver as a surface disinfectant, the provision of food-grade Nano Silver for ingestion by the patients should be considered a humanitarian exception to any current restrictions, as allowed by the WHO pronouncement.
.
The Protocol requires informed patient consent and consideration. The safety of Nano Silver, which is self-sterilizing and can be stored a ambient temperature, under the circumstances of an outbreak of hemorrhagic infection, is not in serious question.
.
Thus the primary concerns expressed by WHO are met.
.
It is therefore my professional opinion that the Foundation’s Nano Silver Ebola Initiative conforms to this non-governmental organization (NGO)’s Mission, as its expressive association, and that is is ethical for physicians to cooperate with the Clinical Test as provided in the Protocol.
.
Ralph Fucetola JD
.

Monday, August 4, 2014

FDA / CDC Word Games Suppress Ebola Therapy



Word Games To Kill By!
Science Shows Ebola Therapy Is Real: There is No “FDA Approved Treatment:  for Ebola Because FDA Lacks the Authority to Approve Nano Silver 10PPM!

UPDATE: DTRA PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGES STUDY!

--------------------
Original Blog Posting:

FDA/CDC persist in claiming that “there is no approved therapy for Ebola” leave  the unwary/uninformed with the impression that these agencies actually have the authority and will to approve natural therapies and that none exist for this purpose.
 .
The truth is that both of these conclusions are inaccurate and misleading.
.
Government bureaucracies are very good at obscuring information through carefully chosen language aimed at both misinforming and dis-informing.
.
In the present circumstances of an out of control Ebola outbreak capable of riding on the wings of commercial and private planes to our own homes and loved ones, this dis/misinformation may well cost vast numbers of lives, throwing the world into a catastrophic near-extinction-level event, unless corrected.
.
FDA and CDC’s use of language to hide well-researched, publicly available natural solutions to the serious health threat of Ebola is an excellent example of the obfuscation and distortion involved in “regulatory-speak,”  Saying  there is no “approved  treatment” for the deadly disease is deceitful and dangerous.  Ebola, without Nano Silver 10 PPM has a mortality rate of 90%.
.
Labeling Ebola as disease-without-treatment leads people to engage in dangerous behavior that can trigger a pandemic, such ignoring contagion,   kidnapping sick relatives from hospitals (as happened in Sierra Leone), hiding family victims or hiding symptoms while traveling.
.
Further, using the immense cachet of these agencies to misinform people into believing that there is neither prevention nor cure (when there is well -documented evidence to the contrary) allows wide-spread unnecessary death in afflicted populations, and the willing surrender of liberties in populations that are afraid for their lives because safe and effective readily available antidotes and preventions have been withheld. The reality is that the Nano Silver 10PPM therapy is safe, effective, inexpensive and easy to use
.
Truly, as General Bert, President of the Natural Solutions Foundation, has warned, "The world is just a plane ride from catastrophe." It is, however, an unnecessary catastrophe, as the US agencies know full well.  These same agencies, it should be noted, are responsible for the irresponsible decision to bring active Ebola cases to the US where, should containment protocols fail, Ebola will be released onto a vulnerable population.
.
Despite the assertions of US Government agencies, international agencies like WHO and corporate-sponsored NGOs that there is "no treatment" there is, in actual fact, a very good therapy, based on natural means to promote health,  resting solidly on the US government's own Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)-sponsored Ebola / Nano Silver 10 PPM study, declassified in 2009.[1]
.
.
Rima E. Laibow, MD, Medical Director of the Natural Solutions Foundation[2], already familiar with Nano Silver 10 PPM from her clinical experience and research, has provided a simple Protocol that uses advanced nutrition (such as large servings of Vitamin C to control inflammation and bleeding) and Nano Silver to address the Ebola crisis.[3]
.
So, contrary to the assertions of agencies, there is a highly effective therapy. How, and why, do the agencies misuse language to misinform the public and professional communities about this urgent matter?
.
As  a legal specialist in regulatory matters, I know well that by using distorting regulation-speak, the supposedly authoritative agencies create a false distinction between "FDA approved Ebola treatment" and a lack of an FDA approved Ebola treatment.  They do it by simply ignoring the regulatory and legal reality: FDA does not have authority to "approve" or disapprove Nano Silver because Nano Silver  is a DSHEA grandfathered nutrient.
.
The phrase "treatment for disease" is a legal "term of art" relating to an approved, standard medical treatment that is deemed to provide a "cure" (or suppression of symptoms) of a recognized disease. Under current US law, no one may claim that any substance is a "treatment" unless it has been approved as such by FDA. So it is technically true that there is no "treatment" despite the existence of 7 filed Ebola-related patents, 6 of which list US government agencies as patent-owners.
.
Nano Silver 10 PPM offers a potentially beneficial therapy over which the FDA has no regulatory authority.
.
FDA does not have authority to "approve" a nutritional substance that is grandfathered, as is nutrient silver, under the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA). Nor may commercial providers of nutrient silver make "treatment of disease" claims for such substances.  Nano Silver 10 PPM, as a dietary substance, is a nutrient, not a drug and is therefore a non-prescription therapy, not a treatment.  The distinction is crucial. 
.
It is a traditional therapy, used in various forms for centuries. Nutrient silver does not do what a prescription drug usually does:  poison enzymes to suppress clinical symptoms. Pathogens cannot develop resistance as the mode of action is nutritional and inhibitory. Since FDA cannot approve the therapy, and has not approved it as a drug “treatment” there is, in fact, an effective therapy which the FDA is powerless to ban and powerless to approve.
.
Agency mis/dis representation means that we are thus faced with a deadly gap between the law and reality. As we move toward what the WHO has termed the “Antibiotic Resistant Apocalypse” will we be in the world health emergency for which the Global Health Security Initiative was supposedly created.[4]
.
.
The DTRA study clearly shows that nano silver inactivates Ebola.
.
In this crisis humanitarian concerns must trump bureaucratic niceties. The US government must come clean and admit that its own research clearly established that Nano Silver can help contain Ebola and can help reduce suffering and death.
.
Anything less will condemn more victims and dishonor the intent of the First Amendment, that competing understandings of the truth may not be restricted by government.
.
Counsel Ralph
Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Trustee and Counsel

Friday, August 1, 2014

High CBD Hemp Oil and Health Freedom

 
.
Why would Natural Solutions Foundation, the world's premiere global health freedom private expressive association, become a grower, producer and distributor of High Potency CBD Hemp Oil™. What does CBD Hemp Oil have to do with Health Freedom or the goals of the Foundation?
.
Short answer? "Everything, since there may not be another nutrient on the planet that is more important to both health and health freedom than High Potency CBD Hemp Oil, nor one more demonized by special interests." 
.
The choice to access the major healing properties of this substance, made both by the hemp plant and by our own bodies* (which is essential to every aspect of health and healthy aging) has been hotly contested - and criminalized - by the fused Corporate/State which stands to lose enormous profit - and unimaginable control - if we can, indeed, take control of our own health using simple, effective and widely available natural solutions like CBD Hemp Oil!
.
Drug sales will plummet. Doctor's visits will plummet.  And health status will soar, meaning that control of the population will return to where it absolutely belongs: the hands of that very population. Those are YOUR hands!
.
Clearly, legal access to both information about CBD and this remarkable nutrient is a huge victory for health and health freedom, but a major loss for the Corporate/State, the depopulation agenda and the coffers of those corporations which deal in chronic illness and your programmed, protracted death as their bottom line.
.
When Major General Bert Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.) and Rima E. Laibow, MD founded the Natural Solutions Foundation in 2004, they established a clear - and very broad - mission: to discover, develop, demonstrate, document and disseminate natural solutions the problems that we all face.
.
Those problems have been largely created by the same forces which now seek to destroy our autonomy over ourselves through assaults on our health, our food, our very planet itself. We have boldly identified the Five Big Lies that threaten you and your family’s health, and we stand in support of your fundamental human right to choose your own health care strategies.

But Natural Solutions does more
than just talk about health freedom
.
We have partnered with some extraordinary people around the world finding and implementing extraordinary natural solutions.
.
In Africa we’ve worked with the UN Center of Excellence Songhai Foundation seeking better agricultural techniques completely free of toxins. In Central America we bought an abandoned, derelict coffee finca (farm), to show farmers how this major “money crop” could be grown using organic technologies and the workers’ families are no longer “sick during the spraying season…” . In South America we have partnered with Agrofutoro, Chile’s only licensed Industrial Hemp producer, to develop natural means for the extraction of organic High CBD Hemp Oil, what Dr. Rima has called “The Holy Graal of Natural Health…”:
.
CBD IS the Holy Grail of Natural Health. It does not matter how you take your CBD, whether it is in organic chocolate, drops, capsules, or oil: a milligram of CBD is a milligram of CBD.  What’s important is that, pretty much for everything from A (Alzheimer’s Disease, Acne) through the “BIG C”  through E (eczema) on to I (inflammation), M (Mood) to P (Pain, Psoriasis) to S (Spasm) through Z (Zoster) and pretty much everything in between if it involves immune function, inflammation or both! (What doesn’t?)
.
Replacing the missing CBD that your body should have been making is simple, safe and efficient.  And the results are amazing.  Taking Nano silver, the safe, gentle universal antimicrobial that kills disease causing organisms but leaves your vitally important beneficial bacteria untouched is the only logical option for dealing with viruses, bacteria, mold, fungi and parasites.
.
You can see why I am so excited, of course: I want our health freedom “family” to have the best in powerful, safe, gentle and effective health care options…”
.
Your health freedom is about your choices
.
http://tinyurl.com/cheesyfda
.
In an ideal world, you would be respected as an autonomous human being with unalienable rights. You would be free to make your own health care choices, guided by information you trust and, if you need them, by those health care professionals you choose.
.
In the opposite world, the dystopian world in which we appear to find ourselves, all those choices will be made for you by government-anointed, licensed, trained and controlled bureaucrats, including those who man the infamous “death panels” currently responsible for about 25% of all deaths in the UK and now becoming well established in the US.
.
In the mad world of crony corporatism,  the purveyors of death, using  toxic medical "treatments" like vaccines (whose risk is completely uninsurable), speak with the authority of the government, telling us what we must and must not do to achieve and maintain a suitable health status. thereby guaranteeing life-long illness, and great profit to the cronies. And perhaps not just coincidentally, putting the tools by which the population may be controlled or culled into the hands of those same forces.
.
They further tell us what we must and must not think and say about health, seeking to control our minds as well as our bodies. Do I exaggerate?
.
Consider the Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI), one of those “public/private partnerships” so beloved by the globalist elite because they are completely unaccountable to anyone but have vast power over those who have no control over these agencies. This one brings together all the usual suspects – UN, USA, Club of Rome, Rockefeller Foundation, Gates Foundation, etc.— following the lead of two protégés of Ban Kee Moon,  the UN Secretary General. These “public health” experts have published articles making the astounding claim that the “most cost effective” way to deal with pandemic threats is to reduce the number of “vectors and victims” – namely people.
.
That would be you and your family.
.
Less people, less disease, less offspring for future disease. It is all so logical. And unspeakably vile.
.
.
In this “Brave New World” of mega-death
the question of health freedom
is a question of life and death.
YOUR life and death
.
When Natural Solutions chooses where to stand and act, we do so for strategic and tactical reasons. And we proudly and intentionally stand to protect and promote CBD Hemp Oil.
.
Your freedom to use High CBD Hemp Oil is essential to your health care freedom of choice, both strategically and tactically.
.
Our strategy is to assert and assure your freedom of choice for this and other health choices at your decision: that includes hemp choice, a major public issue right now. Tactically, Dr. Rima has made it clear: disseminate the scientific literature showing that nutritional CBD makes it easy and safe to address a great many of the threats to our health for which she coined the term “Genome Disruption Syndrome” or GDS.
.
Your health and your freedom come together in  CBD,
the “Holy Grail of Natural Health”
.
There are a few steps you can take to respond to the ongoing Corporatist/State/Globalist threats to your freedom and your health. They include a number of recommendations from Dr. Rima, General Bert and myself.
.
  • CBD – Supplement your diet with High Potency CBD Hemp Oil products, available at http://tinyurl.com/CBDhempoil
  • Nano Silver – Keep a supply of Dr. Rima Recommends The Silver Solution – the first product under the new Dr. Rima Recommends(TM) Label! You do not want to be without it: www.DrKnows.com
  • CBD – Consider participating in our CBD project by supporting the planning and implementation of our state-of-the-art Industrial Hemp growing, processing and marketing operation, Natural Solutions Health, LLC. Contact me at ralph.fucetola@usa.net with your phone number and best time to call, and/or
  • Make sure you are part of the vitally important and effective Health Freedom Action eAlert System, go to: http://drrimatruthreports.com/action/step1/ and make sure dr.laibow@gmail.com is “white listed” on your email system.
.
What will you do as the globalist elite maneuver to further restrict your health care freedom of choice? What will you do when you realize they mean to reduce you to a ward of a not-so-nice Nanny State? The choice, at least for the time being, remains yours.
.
For health and freedom,
Counsel Ralph


.
* In 1995, when I won the DHEA Cases on behalf of two Life Extension Foundation members, we set the precedent that substances indigenous to the human body (such as DHEA or CBD) are not "controlled substances" or "prescription drugs" but rather, are nutrient substances. See: http://www.lifespirit.org/dhealegal.html

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Multiculturalism vs the Sanctity of Human Rights.


Responding to an article on cultural relativism and political correctness*, I wrote:

The issue is not the collective of ideas and norms known as a "culture" and enforced by a government.
Human history is full of examples of cultures (and their religions) imposed at the point of a sword. Every culture/religion has been guilty of initiating violence against the "other."
The best religious teachings have always stood against such collectivist nonsense.
The issue is Individual Rights - the antithesis of collective culture. 
While each person has the right to the pursuit of happiness, which includes adopting whatever culture/religion that person chooses, no collective has any "right" imposing cultural norms on anybody.
That's inherent in Western constitutional heritage, building from the Common Law, starting with, in the United States, the Declaration of Independence with its powerful claim that individuals have inalienable rights.
Rights do not depend on governments or cultures. Rights transcend such transient human constructs.
That is why a free person has the right to condemn cultures that violate individual right.
We have the right of conscience to judge, for example, the ancient world for the abomination of slavery (the antithesis of individual right) and for the evils of the forced subjection of half of humanity (the female half) or the creation of crony monopolies... all the norm before the advent of modernity -- which started with the Declaration's proclamation of "inalienable right" -- the most important political claim of the past millennium.
A free person has the right to condemn the brutality and irrationality of cultures/religions as practiced in violation of individual right.
Truly not all cultures are equal, but all can be condemned from the standpoint of individual right for each has failed, historically, to defend the individual against state oppression predicated on cultural or religious traditions.

Saturday, June 7, 2014

NJ Admin Court Honors Non-Religious Vaccine Exemption Against Private Employer

Extends Religious Exemption into
General Philosophical Exemption

This decision is important because it effectively extends the vaccine religious exemption beyond strictly religious conscientious objection to include "secular" objections to mandated vaccinations. This is similar to the process that occurred during the Viet Nam War Draft, where religious CO status was extended to any person, even the non-religious, who objected to serving involuntarily. Note this case is an Unemployment Insurance case regarding whether the employee was justified in quitting over the vaccine mandate. rf...
Employee Had First Amendment Right To Refuse Flu Shot, N.J. Court Rules
by Mary Pat GallagherNew Jersey Law JournalJune 5, 2014 
http://www.njlawjournal.com/printerfriendly/id=1202658132905
"Denying unemployment benefits to a nurse fired for refusing a flu vaccine for secular reasons violated her First Amendment right to freedom of expression, where hospital policy allowed employees to skip the shot on religious grounds, a N.J. appeals court held on Thursday in a precedential case.
The court reversed the state Department of Labor's Board of Review, which had found that the vaccination policy of June Valent's former employer, Hackettstown Community Hospital, was reasonable and that her refusal to comply with it amounted to "simple misconduct" connected to her job that justified disqualifying her from unemployment benefits. 
'The Board's decision upholding appellant's termination unconstitutionally discriminated against her freedom of expression by improperly endorsing the employer's religion-based exemption to the flu vaccination policy and rejecting the secular choice proffered by appellant,' the Appellate Division said in Valent v. Board of Review."
The Court further stated:
"The religion-based exemption irrefutably illustrates that the flu vaccination policy is not based exclusively on public health concerns because an employee claiming an exemption is only required to sign a form attesting to his or her faith-based reason for refusing to be vaccinated, accompanied with an appropriate note from a religious leader," Fuentes wrote for the panel. 
"These requirements are facially unrelated to public health issues, patient safety concerns, or scientifically valid reasons for the containment of the flu virus," he said, adding that the religion exemption "merely discriminates against an employee's right to refuse to be vaccinated based only on purely secular reasons."


My thanks to Gary Krasner http://www.cfic.us/ for this information.

Friday, May 23, 2014

Toward an Ethics of Sustainability

Sustainability, Ethics and GHSI Tyranny
http://www.drrimatruthreports.com

"Be harmless..." ("Do no harm.") has always been the first rule of humane ethics. Does it remain a valid starting point? Yes, to be either accepted or denied as the first point in the argument. I invite the readers to reach their own conclusions and join in this discussion of the Ethics of Sustainability.

IMHO, any ethical stance starts with a recognition of individual responsibility for individual actions, especially when that human action is taken "on behalf of" corporate fictions, such as a public agency, a business entity, a non-governmental organization or whatever. The collective fictions have no ethics apart from the ethical -- or unethical -- actions of the actual humans who act "on behalf of" these fictions.

It is not the "Majesty of the State" that depresses the button that sends the drone exploding into the wrong wedding party... It is one fallible individual in a darkened room, thousands of miles from the mayhem -- an individual who has separated him or herself from consciously and conscientiously chosen human action.

But that is, of course, the extreme example. Closer to home are simpler ethical decisions, many of these revolving around issues involving sustainability. Example: how carefully should I attend to reusing, re-purposing and recycling the garbage my lifestyle generates?

What is "sustainability?"
  1. (economics) ability to be sustained, without causing problems such as inflation
  2. (ecology) (of economic development, energy sources, etc) ability to be maintained at a steady level without exhausting natural resources or causing severe ecological damage*
While a rather straight-forward concept, akin to, if not "making a profit" at least "not making a loss" the idea of "sustainability" has become a political rallying cry for those who seek a restrained and restricted future for greatly reduced humanity -- in the name of "sustaining" a pre-industrial natural order that has been gone for centuries.

Or, as one of our sustainability mentors, Fr. Godfrey tells us, humanitarian projects need to be done "with passion, perfection and profitability..."**

If the globalist elite's plan to "sustain" nature requires the early deaths of 90% of all humans alive right now, we have a clear example of unethical "sustainability." Mega-death is not conducive to sustaining life! To believe otherwise is to wander into the nightmare of psychopathology.

I do not exaggerate! Take, for example, the Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI) -- one of those "public/private partnerships" beloved of the globalist elite. This UN sponsored agency seeks to prevent pandemic disease by reducing the human population, as the most cost-effective means to that end. See: http://tinyurl.com/EndGHSI.

This is, of course, quite mad!



In this GHSI initiative we see the true (sic) moral attitude of the globalist elite. We see the economics not of the Misean Market, seeking to satisfy consumer demand, but rather of Hitler's Economics Minister Speer who oversaw the Nazi State devouring the accumulated wealth of conquered Europe. Like the Roman Imperial State, the globalist elite are nothing but violent looters.

We, the human population, in the expressed view of the globalist elite,*** are viewed as chattel to be disposed of as the elite finds convenient and economical.

Another catch-word for this hideous process is "Agenda 21" - the globalist depopulation agenda.

http://www.truthaboutagenda21.com

True ethics seeks to sustain humanity on this, our home world, while addressing social problems with natural solutions. 

For example, contrary to GHSI, the best natural solution for pandemics is better nutrition and natural remedies like Nano Silver (see: www.DrRimaKnows.com) not genomicide engendered by the technologies of death: GMOs, drug/vaccine toxins, "phude" toxins, radiation and geo-engineering!

Thus, we seek an ethics of sustainability that recognizes the primacy of the individual and that person's inalienable rights. This is, of course, the opposite of collective claims to restrict, restrain and reduce individual choice.

http://www.truthaboutagenda21.com


As autonomous, independent human actors we have a choice. We can accept the myth that to sustain this planet's ecosystem in a particular configuration, the elite must be allowed to destroy humanity, or we can insist on our prior right to live in a world that allows freedom of action, so long as one does no harm to the equal rights of others.

As the great 20th Century praxiologist, L. von Mises taught, "All human action is predicated on dissatisfaction..." (see: www.Mises.org). We can achieve a free and sustainable world.
Man's freedom to choose and to act is restricted in a threefold way. There are first the physical laws to whose unfeeling absoluteness man must adjust his conduct if he wants to live. There are second the individual's innate constitutional characteristics and dispositions and the operation of environmental factors; we know that they influence both the choice of the ends and that of the means, although our cognizance of the mode of their operation is rather vague. There is finally the regularity of phenomena with regard to the interconnectedness of means and ends, viz., the praxeological law as distinct from the physical and from the physiological law. 
The elucidation and the categorical and formal examination of this third class of laws of the universe is the subject matter of praxeology and its hitherto best-developed branch, economics. The body of economic knowledge is an essential element in the structure of human civilization; it is the foundation upon which modern industrialism and all the moral, intellectual, technological, and therapeutical achievements of the last centuries have been built. It rests with men whether they will make the proper use of the rich treasure with which this knowledge provides them or whether they will leave it unused. But if they fail to take the best advantage of it and disregard its teachings and warnings, they will not annul economics; they will stamp out society and the human race.****
The moral choices remain as stark today as they were just after WWII when Mises penned these conclusions.

We live in a lawful Universe where the human mind can understand means and ends. When we make choices among means to attain ends, those choices are further restrained by the imperative that we each individually act ethically, for that is the only way we can live in an ethical society.

http://www.truthaboutagenda21.com
--------------------

* http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/sustainability
** http://youtu.be/IOhBtHpCtAg
*** See Dr. Rima's video on the Globalist Agenda: http://youtu.be/_gWmVtn5JsA
**** http://mises.org/humanaction/chap39sec3.asp