Legal Actions to Stop the Shot

10.15.09 Update - Motion for Injunction filed in Null, Laibow et al v FDA Federal Case: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3657

10.09.09 Update - Challenge to FDA "Swine Flu" 2009-H1N1-A Vaccine Licenses filed in US District Court in Washington, DC [Docket: 1:09-cv-01924]. Gary Null PhD and Rima Laibow MD lead NY healthcare workers alleging harm from Federal government unlawful vaccine approvals, as a result of New York State's first-in-the-nation flu vaccine mandate. See: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3617 Further, the State-level challenge to the NY regulation has an injunction hearing scheduled for October 14th. See: http://wcbstv.com/topstories/mandatory.h1n1.vaccine.2.1240506.html

----------------

Americans are not going to take it any more. Most healthcare workers, including doctors, refuse to take voluntary vaccines.

I've spent some time on the phone with both Tim Vawter (pro se plaintiff in New Jersey) and Carmen Reynolds (the retired Air Force officer, pro se plaintiff challenging Florida's draconian forced treatment law) privately discussing the legal requirements for injunctive relief. As one trained in the law, I applaud the efforts of pro-se litigants to assert their rights in court. [In the past couple days, Plaintiff Vawter's injunction application was denied and Col. Reynolds' action survived its first court appearance.]

On behalf of Natural Solutions Foundation, I'm also actively communicating with a group of patriot lawyers around the country seeking ways to help people pursue legal actions to Stop the Shot.

Several strong actions are being planned in NY state on behalf of the healthcare workers by lawyers who represent vaccine injured people and people seeking to assert vaccination exemptions. Another group is about to file on the federal level. I can't reveal all the details, since we want to maintain something of the element of surprise in these cases..... so stay tuned.

Let us just say that even though the Federal Appeals Court in DC decided last Tuesday that the soldier-plaintiffs from the 2003 forced anthrax vaccine cases do not have "standing" to complain about the squalene contaminated anthrax vaccine, we believe we will be able to get the attention of the courts in the civilian cases being filed.

And what if the courts determine that no one is allowed redress from these dangerous, uninsurable drugs? Where is our redress then? As I said, stay tuned.

One more thing while I ramble:

"The World Health Organization, the UN agency (ir-) responsible for declaring a Phase 6 “PANDEMIC” global alert over what it calls H1N1 Influenza A or Swine Flu, whose chief Dr Margaret Chan has repeatedly warned that while Swine Flu to date had been rather mild, that the emergency declaration was necessary because it “could mutate” aggressively into a deadly pandemic killing millions, now admits well into the flu season in the Northern Hemisphere that H1N1 has apparently not mutated."

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=13803

So New York's "emergency" flu vaccine mandates are based on no emergency; the HHS's April 25th declaration of "emergency" with its language exculpating all government officials from the harm that may occur is based on no emergency; the imminent Emergency Use Authorization that will permit the use of "adjuvants" (immune system toxins) that have never been permitted in drugs in the United States, because the government's own scientists will not sign off on them, will be based on no emergency.