I Will NOT Comply: Propagandemic 2.0 Mandates and Restrictions are Unlawful!

 "They" are coming after us again... with unlawful mandates and restrictions...

https://loud-proud-and-free.printify.me/products

Although the COVID-19 declared "Pandemic disease" of 2020/22 was proven to be not much more dangerous than the Annual Flu, especially if you take into account that nearly no one died from the 'disease' but millions died from the officially-sanctioned 'treatment' for same and continue to die from long-term adverse reactions to the novel, barely tested, gene-altering 'vaccines'.

 

The restrictions and mandates imposed globally have been shown to have been not just useless, but actually causing harm, especially to young people. Courts around the world are reaching the only just solution:  the lockdowns and restrictions have been unlawful from the start.

 

The World Health Organization -- WHO -- backed by various government 'health' agencies and NGOs, having learned nothing from the disaster over which it presided, wants to double down, adopting draconian regulations for future declared pandemics, manipulating the process of creating a new 'pandemic treaty' and establishing a framework for a world-wide 'vaccine passport' system. Of course their complicit national agencies are preparing more lockdowns and mandates.

 

"They" are telling us that all these failed policies are coming back at us. "They" are telling us we must comply.

 

But we know the truth:  the disaster stopped only when millions of resisters joined together in World Wide Rallies and Trucker Convoys and refused to comply. It took a year for our protests to succeed, but we learned a valuable lesson. 

 

This time we are ready to resist from the start.

 

Compliance kills; defiance frees.

 

Declare that you will not comply here:  https://PreventGenocide2030.org

 

The unlawfulness of the lockdown, restriction and mandate regime is clear.

 

The violations of the universal right to free speech through government--big tech collusion are now well-known. 

 

Recent court decisions in the USA have reinforced that understanding.  Both the trial judge and the first appellate level court agreed to enjoin the Regime's program of instructing media companies as to what truthful information was to be suppressed.  The case is Missouri vs Biden and it will reach the US Supreme over the next few months. The courts took the extraordinary step of enjoining the White House due to the obvious unlawfulness of the Regime's attempts to ignore the First Amendment's pledge to respect freedom of communications.

"On July 4, 2023, Judge Terry A. Doughty issued a preliminary injunction against several agencies and members of the Biden administration from contacting social media services to request the blocking of material, with exceptions for material involving illegal activity. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that there had been some coercion in the government's contact with social media companies in violation of the First Amendment, but narrowed the extent of Doughty's injunction to block any attempts by the government to threaten or coerce moderation on social media..."*

It is my opinion, as a scholar of the Law, that the great legal lession of the declared pandemic is that governments will engage in unlawful behavior anytime they have an excuse.  Eventually the legal system catches-up with legal precedence and government overreach is somewhat restricted.

 

It has been said that "The courts follow the elections..." but I suggest they also hear the shouting in the streets.

 

They will hear I Will Not Comply.

 

------------

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._Biden

Strolling for Freedom

Expressing Non-Compliance

Just strolling down a sidewalk with some friends can constitute resistance to authority, triggering the anti-First and Second Amendment authoritarian Left. 

That’s what a group of Proud Boys learned during August 2023 in upstate New York. They met one weekend noon and over several hours strolled down the main streets of several nearby towns, carrying flags, including the Stars and Stripes, along with the Gadsden ‘Don’t Tread on Me’ and Proud Boy ‘Laurels’ flags.

The corporate media, echoed by local politicos, tried to spin a ‘peaceful and patriotic’ walk into a continuation of the January 6th ‘Insurrection’. Local citizens’ reaction did not reflect their ‘leaders’ prejudices. They warmly greeted the strollers and during the following few days a number of them spoke favorably about the strollers before local municipal meetings.

Now people across the globe are being told to prepare for another round of useless mask mandates, devastating lockdowns and ‘unavoidably unsafe’ vaccines. 

To freedom advocates this recalls how the lockdowns and other unscientific impositions ended: when people around the world came together in the World Wide Demonstrations, Trucker Convoys and mass refusals to comply the ‘emergency’ ended. Even in totalitarian Red China.

The prospects for the survival of the Republic — “If you can keep it.” — look bleak. Thousands have been criminally charged, or otherwise punished by banks or other state corporatist entities for walking and speaking. 

A number of patriot leaders have been sentenced to decades in prison for protesting what they consider to be a stolen election in 2020, becoming martyrs whose freedom must be a primary demand of the Freedom Movement. The Movement seeks restoration of the freedoms taken during the 2020/22 'pandemic.'

There is a growing consensus in the Freedom Movement that mass action must continue. The call is: “I refuse to comply”

We will not comply with mandates, lockdowns and corporate collusion with government to censor or punish speech. We want an end to war and anti-science corporate ‘health’ care.

Compliance is death.

The unprecedented increase in ‘all cause’ deaths since the vaccine rollout proves that.

Life is in our Great Reject of their Great Reset.

I do not consent. I will not comply.

https://PreventGenocide2030.org

Informed Dissent -New Book by Counsel Ralph

 INFORMED DISSENT

During the Years of the Declared Pandemic, On the Way to World War Three: 2019 - 2023

https://www.lulu.com/shop/ralph-fucetola/informed-dissent/paperback/product-9nyzn2.html

The ‘pandemic’ started in early 2020 but things were already in motion in 2019, with at least one ‘think tank’ running a simulation scenario in October involving a new pandemic disease that would rapidly spread from a lab in a city in China. Perhaps synchronistically at nearly the same time I gave a paper at the Libertarian Scholars' Conference (King's College, Manhattan) on Informed Consent.  

Our essays begin with that paper, but reach back to cover the disturbing developments regarding vaccine mandates earlier that year.

The following opinion pieces are divided into two sections: Pandemic and Freedom. Within each section they are mostly organized by date.

With Gratitude to:
Rima E. Laibow MD for reminding us: “Don’t You Dare!”
General Bert for telling the world: 
  “Informed Consent is the Defining Issue of the 21^st Century” and
James Roguski for coining the phrase: “Informed Dissent”

© 2023 – LifeSpirit   By: Ralph Fucetola JD --     ISBN:   978-1-312-57295-9

Contributor Notes:  Your author is a retired lawyer (36 years practice) and minister.  The opinions expressed in Informed Dissent are those of the Author, not necessarily those of the Institute for Health Research.  

"Informed Dissent means demanding transparency, open communications and unfettered freedom of speech, which are essential to prevent tyrannical consequences of ‘pandemics-of-convenience’ and widespread chronic ill health."

Table of Contents

PART ONE: PANDEMIC,Informed Consent Paper,The Seven Principles of Humane Health Care,Rep. Gottheimer Misunderstands,Tribunals of Conscience,The Great Facebook Purge of 2020,Mandatory Masking and the ADA,New York Lawyers Need a Lesson in the Law,"The Police Power of the State is Not without Limits",An Open Letter to Justin Amash: Speak Out for Informed Consent!,Mind Control and COVID,Martial Law, the US Constitution and COVID-19,Can the USA Survive the COVID Pandemic?,Who is Telling the Truth about COVID-19?,The Good Health Lawyer Obtains Vaccine TRO,Coronavirus and Bioweapons,Deadly Coronavirus from China or CDC?,Call to Veto,NJ Senate Delays Abrogation of Religious Conscientious Objections to Vaccines,Lawyers Against Mandatory Vaccines,The Persecution of Vaccine Conscientious Objectors,Politico Reports:  The "Two Party" System and Vaccine Mandates,Fox News Fake News Vaxx Propaganda Attacks NY Jewish Community,What Measles Outbreak?,Forced Vaccination is a Crime Against Humanity,

PART TWO:  FREEDOM,Libertarians and Nationalists: A New Generation Arises,We are the Resistance to the Great Reset,The Empowered Fear the Powerless,The State of Exception: Tyranny's Theory,The "White Supremacist" Big Lie,Song Review: By God We'll Have Our Home Again,The Meme Wars,Ninth Circuit Ignores Second Amendment,Speaking the Unspeakable:  The First Amendment & Violent Overthrow,Is the End of the USA Unthinkable?,Rubicon or Reichstag at the Capitol?,Was the 2020 Election Legitimate?,Nationalist Libertarianism,Federal Communications Commission Comments,Comments to FCC Regarding Trump Censorship Petition,Trump Issues Internet Censorship Policy Order,Social Media Must Honor Freedom of Speech,

APPENDIX,2019 Informed Consent Paper Slides,General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent,My Biography,Essay Sources & Dates

Debt Limit Default Big Lie

 "Raise the Debt Limit or
Default on the Federal Government Debt"

Big Lie

Head of the Regime Biden asserts he has the power, under the 14th Amendment, to unilaterally raise the Federal Debt Limit without Congress's consent.  

The actual words of the Amendment, however, suggest differently:  It is Congress that has plenary power over the Debt, not whoever holds the office of President.

"Section 5 - The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

Some weeks ago Speaker McCarthy made a political mistake when he spoke (6 February 2023) and supported 'raising the debt ceiling' but with 'reservations'.  In early May the Republican House Majority passed a Debt Increase 217 to 215, with several Freedom Caucus Republicans refusing to vote in favor. 

When a government has to borrow more to pay the interest on its debt it is clearly bankrupt, but for the largesse of its creditors.  No one who lends money to the US Government under those circumstances has a legitimate expectation of being repaid. Repudiation of the debt may be the only choice of future generations and may be the necessary precondition for the restoration of the Republic.

Both governing parties, what we can call the Uniparty, are unwilling to stop the bubble the massive 'printing' of fiat currency must engender. Both sides of the Uniparty depend on pumping the bubble, primarily through ever growing agencies and programs. Both sides will keep the game going until the formerly 'good as gold' US Dollar evaporates even more than it has over the past century of Federal Reserve fiat monopoly.

Pointing out the truth of the Federal Debt, some suggest, violates the 14th Amendment's clause against 'questioning' the Debt.  I cannot imagine that the authors of the Amendment thought the 14th Amendment amended the First Amendment.  Those who say that 'failing to raise the debt limit' will cause the Federal Government to 'default' on its debt are lying -- so long as they have trillions in taxes coming in they can service their debt -- and they are "questioning the debt" themselves... 

Calling debt-financed government 'fraud' is protected speech.

Nonetheless we are told that the US government might 'default' on its public debt if the 'ceiling' is not raised.  But what exactly is this limit on the Federal Treasury's ability to borrow?

From the beginning of the Republic until relatively recently every issuance of Federal notes had to be authorized by a specific enactment by Congress.  Every time the USA went deeper into debt Congress had to take responsibility.  Thus, for generations the Federal debt remained relatively low.

Then in 1917 Congress decided to hide its Constitutional obligations regarding debt and substituted the 'Debt Ceiling' for actual Congressional oversight. [1] In that year the Debt was 5.7 billion dollars (when twenty dollars equaled an ounce of gold) [2]. Today the debt tops $31 trillion, a 5,438 percent increase.

What Speaker McCarthy does not address is the 'Elephant in the Room' which is that the US Government is not obligated to go further into debt to service its Debt.  It can do that from the taxes it collects.  Defaulting would thus be a political choice.  

The opposite policy choice is to use incoming revenues to pay the interest on the debt, and, for the sake of our grandchildren's future, begin to pay it off.   The Federal Government takes in at least $4.7 trillion [3] so it has plenty of money to meet its debt. What's left over can be applied to other government expenses, or returned to the taxpayers.

Why then does the Uniparty want to raise the Debt Ceiling? 

So Congress can spend even more money than it has, without taking political responsibility.

Big-Spender Biden has a new ally in Big Spender McCarthy. Both are, in effect, defrauding the public and causing the Federal Debt to be 'questioned.'.

We are in a time when the savings and real incomes of the real people who contribute to the real national economy (that means private employees and small businesspeople, including farmers and craftsmen) are falling, as a result of government inflationary policies.  The special reserve status of the US fiat dollar is disappearing. 

The elite classhas no worries. It increasingly includes all Federal employees, who now represent the highest paid employees in the nation, with the greatest benefits, all at the expense of taxpayers who cannot keep-up with increasingly expensive basic living expenses. [4]

Prudent leaders would slash government spending, abolishing whole departments and agencies, especially those in charge of Making America Woke instead of Making America Great Again.  We must abolish the 87,000 new armed IRS agents; we must defund the other recently armed multiple Federal Police Agencies.  They are a clear and present threat to the Republic.

Years ago Ron Paul suggested that, since 'we owe it to ourselves' the Federal Reserve's share of the national debt could be written off. That step would reduce the debt by $6.2 trillion. [5] 

Clearly there is no reasonable need to raise the Debt Ceiling.

It is time that the Federal Government spent within our means. Certainly the Head of the Regime claiming the power to dictate the level of the Federal Debt is a clear and present threat to the Republic.  We are governed by a Regime that no longer even pretends to govern under the Constitution, making it a lawless Regime.

If Congress fails to gut federal spending the bursting of the bubble will result in a forced restructuring of governance on this Continent.

The Debt Limit should not be raised one fiat penny!

If not now, the time will come when a new generation refuses to be bound by the fraudulent promises of a previous generation's disingenuous politicians.

The clock is ticking...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_debt_ceiling
[2] https://www.thestreet.com/politics/national-debt-year-by-year-14876008
[3] https://www.thebalancemoney.com/current-u-s-federal-government-tax-revenue-3305762
[4] https://www.justfactsdaily.com/most-federal-employees-are-paid-more-than-their-private-sector-counterparts
[5] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FDHBFRBN